How a nation should design its national curriculum for its students? Fixing a rigorous educational paradigm for all students may appear as easy choice. For better educational development, a nation should not impose same national curriculum in schools, let alone in colleges.
First of all, not every human being has similar cognitive skill. Every student has different learning capability. While some students may be undermined by the national curriculum, it also can be overburdened for some naive students. Therefore, unified national curriculum should not be pragmatic for providing knowledge to students with variegated learning capabilities.
In addition to the learning capabilities, there can be ethnic variation among students. Teaching islamic norms to a shiekh student would be a superfluous thing. Again, imposing arabic learning to jews community would be a threat to their national identity.
Last of all, not all student has same subject preference. Swallowing a lot of subjects in precocious stage will not stay longer in their pliable brain. Although, fixing some predefined modicum subject choices can be a good concession point. In that case, combine similar subjects to a single one in pre-school, and provide sub-catagories for each subject in higher classes.
We can conclude that, unified educational curriculum is not practical for cognitive growth of a child. Proper choice for the study field should be presented for every children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...not stay longer in their pliable brain. Although, fixing some predefined modicum subject...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 14.8657303371 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 58.6224719101 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 223.0 442.535393258 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59192825112 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97648421192 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596412556054 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8139376113 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.9375 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9375 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206190985078 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795272659146 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079838984035 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123270146053 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858289785551 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.