The reading posits that reduced work-week will be beneficent for a company, a country, as well as each individual. The lecture casts doubt on these points with significant examples.
At first, the reading says that, 4 days work-week instead of 5 days, is profitable for a company. Each employee will have opportunity for rest and they will be more alert while working. It will reduce error and cost of employee. Therefore, the company can hire more stuff for same amount of money.
However, the lecture argues that, it will not reduce cost for the company. Company will require to do more training for higher number of stuffs. Also, company will need to by more office space and equipment.
Next, the reading says about reduced unemployment rate for a country. Higher job opportunity leads to more employment options.
Conversely, the lecture eliminate this claim by asserting that, companies will not higher more employee because of its increased expenditure. Again, it says that, higher authority of a company may increase their expectation from each employee because of the reduced work hours. This will create more pressure on the workforce leading to employee dissatisfaction, resulting in increased unemployment.
At last, increased salary and living quality is claimed by the reading. An employee will have enough time to save his money and spend time with his family. The reading contend that this will lead to better life expectancy with higher living quality.
On the contrary, reduction of job security for an individual has been pointed out by the lecture. Because of the higher expenditure of a company and increased expectancy from the worker lead to lower job stability. Employees performance for reduced work days will be ignored compared to others. Therefore, partiality in promotion happens and increase risk for job stability.
In summary, the reading argues for reduced work days with better company profit, higher employment rate, and increased life standard. In contrast, the lecture claims higher job risk for increased company cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...t for the company. Company will require to do more training for higher number of stuf...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contends'.
Suggestion: contends
...spend time with his family. The reading contend that this will lead to better life expe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in contrast, in summary, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30395136778 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70676500743 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495440729483 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4103147633 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8695652174 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3043478261 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.09492273731 195% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323753040933 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10842056323 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683691944376 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16787014739 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672307190366 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.