Although ancient writers scolded Caludius for his hostile nature, the reading argues that, he has indelible imprint in the history roman empire. The lecture scrupulously warded off several points made by the reading.
At first, the reading argues that, Caludius did some major innovations, like building of a harbor and several aqueducts - made to provide clean water. His new laws protect civil rights and expand Roman citizenship. The lecture pointed out some of the bad effects of his innovation like conquering power by assassination results civil war, new laws produced some bad judicial results, and rampage by introducing gladiator game, etc.
Secondly, touting his entrustment to slaves and women, the reading presents his modified bureaucratic framework and points his wisdom. The lecture argues that, his new bureaucratic model created corrupt slaves, murderous wives, and fascist ruler like Nero, his firstborn son.
In summary, while the reading tries to prove Caludius' innovative nature and inciteful bureaucracy, the lecture showed several bad results of his actions. Even if the reign of Claudius has massive historic importance, the lecture argues that, it only proved his nefarious nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...an citizenship. The lecture pointed out some of the bad effects of his innovation like conq...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 184.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60326086957 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64905678047 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9127740054 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0762560902594 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036747826981 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314064653321 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528956306187 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205373298461 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.42419426049 126% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.