Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r

Two proposed sites, S1 and S2, will be used for building a new shopping mall at Brandfield city.
Adjacent to the City Center, both of the proposed sites are enclosed by a railway, passing through center of the city, and a connecting road. Therefore, both places will be easily accessible either by train or car. City planners are able to choose the places distant from the golf course and the park. They try to isolate the park from the noise of the shopping mall.
Both of these places have strategic differences in terms of location. Situating near the housing estate, the S1 site will be easily accessible for household residents. This site is also far away from the industrial site, keeping the mall free from industrial pollution. Although, the S1 site will definitely pollute the nearby river, the S2 site, situated far away from the river-flow, will not harm the river.
In summary, both of the proposed sites have benefit of being easily accessible by train and car. While both sites are isolated from the park and the golf course, S1 may cause to pollute the river and S2 may be affected by industrial pollution.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'polluting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: polluting
... park and the golf course, S1 may cause to pollute the river and S2 may be affected by ind...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, while, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77435897436 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45907996886 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9571691304 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6363636364 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149667229835 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680220178959 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715893269609 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124490237378 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918387119908 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.