This topic raises the controversial issue of whether all students should receive the same education countrywide or not. Indisputably, an equal national curriculum brings several benefits such as lowering chance-differences among pupils from different social classes or easing the choosing process of colleges. Nevertheless, children's different talents and preferences is crucial to be considered at a young age already to let the students develop their specific strenths from an early age. Hence, I believe that an overall equal education rather worsens the children's opportunities in their future life than benefits them.
First of all, our economy of specialisation already proved impressively how much of a positive impact it makes for the whole society by increasing the outputs of the people. I would like to point out that children already know from a very young age what they have fun doing or where their talents are hidden. To illustrate that further, many children prefer to join the working population in an earlier age, some aim for a much longer education which is more theoretically based. In this circumstance, making all students go through the same education obviously does not make much sense since it hinders to develop their respective preferences. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that a school system which offers different tracks benefits the students to develop in the areas of interest they prefer.
Furthermore, different federal states have often different cultural histories. This reflects on the school system they have in their respective regions. Whereas religion plays a big role in one state, for instance in Bavaria in Germany), in other states the population rather introduces a subject to get to know the nature better for the primary school. Hence, all the arguments above show clear evidence that a separated school system makes sense to keep.
Admittedly, a national curriculum has it upsides as well. Children from all sorts of social backgrounds enjoy the same education and, therefore, get offered the same chances when graduating from school. Moreover, additional admission tests for a bachelor's program and the connected administrative costs in both schools and upper education institutes decrease significantly. However, the children of a nation is it's biggest asset and should receive the highest importance in politics. So, the preferences of the children and, therefore, a separated curriculum to foster the children's specialisation and acquiring of knowledge has more weight.
In conclusion, although there are some arguments in favour of a national curriculum, there arguments benefiting the students and their educational development has more important. As long as we give all children the same opportunities and freedom to choose their track, they will benefit from tracks matching everyone's preferences in a better way for sure. In fact, in the future schools with even more possibilities of choice, such as programming courses, are likely to become reality to further support the children's individual skills.
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s77
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o55
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.62
- People should question the rule of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 83
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard ho29
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2602.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48945147679 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01528092059 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9227144524 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.904761905 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95238095238 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181739263511 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616649743859 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620914383632 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107816678791 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048604084898 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.