The issue states that a nation should mandate all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they come of age when they are admitted in colleges. A national curriculum has a number of significant benefits which ensure better education and shaping of an individual, as compared with a non-homogenous distribution of education systems across the states of a nation. While having the liberty to teach what they consider is important, in the absence of a national curriculum, institutions may not be fully capable of deciding what's best for a student to learn.
The most fundamental aspect of a national curriculum is the homogeneity in the levels of subjects and the inclusion of all or most facts of the world without personal or local bias. One would like to imagine going to a school where one is taught only the subject(s) one is fond of, but how would one know what subject(s) those are if one is not exposed to all of them at first? A national curriculum ensures all students are taught everything with equal emphasis on each of the components of the curriculum without favouring any particular part, so that a student, when they come of an age when they can pick what's best for themselves, can learn without the idea that they missed out on discovering something that they might have liked better. As against this, a school which has their own modified curriculum might include components in their curriculum that would prepare individuals for fields of study that they teach in higher levels, or even worse, they might only teach the students those subjects that woudl later evolve into specific professions of their school's picking, thus influencing a student's life to the point that they don't possess sufficient knowledge or the ability to pick for themselves.
Another very saliant feature of a country-wide homogenized curriculum is the evaluation of students at the end of their schooling to further admit them in respective colleges and universities based on how they fare. A standard of such an evaluation can only be set if the students are known to have been exposed to the same level of education in their childhood, thus, avoiding any misfortune or inequality of sorts. Such a mechanism cannot be better achieved in a nation with multiple, incongruous curriculums.
When they enter college, supposing they were each taught different curriculums, how would the professors at the college gauge what they know and teach them together according to that information. One student might have studied history at a length, while another might have delved into purely sciences of the body, and a third might have been taught just the magic of numbers in our lives. Such a heterogenously-educated batch of students would not agree on any level of discussion and thus, would render the education endorsed by the college professionals almost entirely useless as a whole.
In conclusion, I believe it is safe to state that a national curriculum eliminates the chance of a biased set of subjects, broadens the student's horizons the best, keeps in mind and in practice, a certain standard of evaluation, shapes students to be compatible with each other and the rest of the world, and in time, prepares them to pick a professional stream for themselves. The importance of such a homogenized curriculum cannot be emphasized more as the most important resource of a nation is its people and all people begin at school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ns may not be fully capable of deciding whats best for a student to learn. The mos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... they come of an age when they can pick whats best for themselves, can learn without ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1097, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...eir schools picking, thus influencing a students life to the point that they dont posses...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1134, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... a students life to the point that they dont possess sufficient knowledge or the abi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 453, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ed curriculum cannot be emphasized more as the most important resource of a nation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, third, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2868.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98782608696 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90783440814 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460869565217 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 902.7 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.0954598031 60.3974514979 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.2 118.986275619 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.3333333333 23.4991977007 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371536313866 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136849095463 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127302815659 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217046858193 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120389069773 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 14.1392134831 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 12.1743820225 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.