“A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer”
Some people support the opinion that all students in a country should have a unit national curriculum while some believe that it should be decide by schools, which curricula is better to educate before entering the college. There are some pros and cons about this that should be considered.
A national curriculum would be beneficial in a number of respects. Firstly, by having a common core curriculum we can focus on basic skills and knowledge. Furthermore, students would have a chance to identify their interests and follow them in colleague. Secondly, a unit school curriculum provides a predictable foundation and students could compete with each other in applying for universities and acquire job opportunities. Actually it would help to ensure that evaluation under same criteria is feasible. In addition, college administrator and faculty could more easily select course materials for freshmen that are neither below nor above their level of educational experience.
However, a common curriculum that is also an exclusive one would pose certain problems, which might outweigh the benefits, noted above. First of all it limits freedom and creativity for teachers and students, and this course courses don’t establish on the basis of student’s interest. The public's reasoning about standards is largely misunderstood because of a reasoning fallacy of generalizing that if something is good for an individual, it is good for everyone. For example: High scores on tests grant entry to elite universities, therefore high scores must be right for the nation as a whole. Most parents would probably like their children to have high scores. However, looking at our nation as a whole we should come to a different conclusion. In that situation we would want a combination of people that are able to be leaders, followers, heroes, creators, producers, so that the society could function for the benefit of everyone.
Secondly, the inflexible nature of a uniform curriculum would preclude the inclusion of programs, courses, and materials that are primarily of regional or local significance. For example, Tabriz, in Iran's historic Azerbaijan region, requires children at certain grade levels to learn about the Turkish language, carpet industry, history, culture and traditions about the city. A national curriculum might not allow for this feature.
In my opinion curriculum standards should become more connected to community and student needs. Due to that it could be more flexible and consider some time intervals between national curriculum for each region. Therefore every region could have beneficial programs for students.
In conclusion, implementation the same national curriculum for elementary and secondary education would amount to a double edge sword. While it would serve as an insurance policy against a populate ignoramuses, at same time it might serve to obliterate cultural diversity and tradition. The optimal government approach is a balance one that imposes a basic curriculum yet leaves the rest up to each state.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decided'?
Suggestion: decided
...um while some believe that it should be decide by schools, which curricula is better t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about this that should be considered. A national curriculum would be beneficia...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...um might not allow for this feature. In my opinion curriculum standards shoul...
^^
Line 9, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...en national curriculum for each region. Therefore every region could have beneficial prog...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 189, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ld serve as an insurance policy against a populate ignoramuses, at same time it might serv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m yet leaves the rest up to each state.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2586.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45569620253 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93864514953 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552742616034 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4761539316 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219398084828 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648430317442 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628122650905 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117069425331 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264708005856 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.