In order for any work of art, whether film, literature, sculpture, or a song to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Art is a very powerful means of expression of thought; every artist strives to communicate his though through arts. What if people have difficulty discerning the message that a piece of arts meant to express? I think art should be lucid enough to be understood by most of the people to have merit. Because, arts is a mirror of the society and it should clearly reflects true characteristics of a society. On the other hand, in some circumstances, some arts may not be readily understandable because of its sophisticated nature.
In the first place, we must agree that value of arts should be determined by the evaluation of the public at large. Since, if a reader or an observer of arts is unable to understand the theme of the arts, there is no point on reading or observing a particular art. So, the art lost its scope and becomes limited to esoteric few. By way of example, Chetan Bhagat—an Indian novelist—is famous for his lucidity. His Novels are in the list of world’s best-selling books. However, there are other plenty of writers and novelist in India who are under the shadow of Mr. Bhagat even though they are good in themselves. The problem is they have failed to understand public choices. Most of the people are not capable of understanding high level language and sentence structure; so, an artist should make sure that people can understand his creation rather than making more complex in the name of sophisticated writing.
In the second place, if the creation of the artist is understandable to most of the people, it will not take long time for the artist to be well-known and to promote his arts. By way of example, a Syrian artist Abdalla AI Amari is gaining popularity in the world because of his unique and lucid way of expressing arts. Mr. Amari painted the world leaders, such as: Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Emanuel Macron and so forth, as refugees in the caravan fleeing Syria due to conflict. His message was clear that he wanted to pressurize world leader in solving such tragedy in Syria. Millions of people on social media shared his painting supporting Mr. Amari’s cause.
Admittedly, it is not to say that art completely lost it value if it not understandable to most of the people. For example, the philosophical books, such as: Apology, Republic by Plato, are not readily understandable by a layman; however, importance of these books for our civilization is undeniable. Similarly, ‘The communist manifesto’ written by Karl Max has become one of the greatest gifts of human brain and its relevance in the present world, even after hundreds of years, is same. But no one would disagree that Communist manifesto is easily palpable for common people. So, in some scenario, valuable piece of art may not be easily discernible; however, they do not lose their merit.
Finally, even though some arts are of great merit without being straightforward to most of the people; however, in most of the cases arts should be understandable to most of the people in order to have merit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'reflect'
Suggestion: reflect
...or of the society and it should clearly reflects true characteristics of a society. On t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'values'?
Suggestion: values
... not to say that art completely lost it value if it not understandable to most of the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, similarly, so, well, for example, i think, such as, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2521.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8667953668 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88015166691 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503861003861 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4587357314 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.041666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54166666667 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28034982658 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815967154208 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888727876948 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191546598516 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102980087109 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.