In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
What shaped the present day’s inventions? Was it the passion of the creators or the necessity? Yes, both of them contributed, yet, the power of imagination was the basis of numerous creations and still is. I agree to the prompt that training students in writing poems, novels and stories engenders a highly capable individual. There are two reasons for me to assert this recommendation.
First of all, the ability to imagine the unimagined instills profuse creativity in a person. Creative people are thus are able to solve problems faced in daily-lives. Any activity that enhances such trait, results in betterment of human’s lives in technology, philosophy ,and many other fields. For instance, famous motivational speaker Jay Shetty, started writing books, in the due course, he understood better about “life”. In addition, there are many such instances where when individuals starteda applying their creative and imaginative skills, eventually finding newer meanings and become better individuals. Further, famous poet, Rumi, discovered the depth of life when he started writing poetry. Had he overlooked his writing talent, the world would have missed valuable epithets. Hypothetically, if humans had lost their visualization and creative power, would the world function as it is doing now? Many knowledge-imparting literature that acts as an anodyne for many, technological advancements like T.V, internet and mobile phones, would not have seen its inception. Thus, if students are given opportunities to inculcate imaginative skill through poetry, novels and literature, better creations would engender in the society.
Secondly, in a competitive world like today, varied interests persists in students. Many are unsure on which path to take. Such students may find their area of passion, if schools and universities take courses on writing. For instance, if a student inherently has the talent to allure audience with his/her writing skills, and unfortunately was unware this, such programs will help the individual find his talent and eventually help him/her to succeed in the field. In addition, in the society where unemployment is seeing its surge, any additional skills enhances the financial survival of a person. For example, a student trained to write stories and novels during schooling, will inculcate the talent and eventually if his passion or job did not turn his/her way, this extracurricular skill will aid in survival.
In conclusion, I agree to the prompt that courses on writing literature will make an individual an all-rounder, firstly it will aid him/her in creating better inventions (also includes better solutions for daily problems), secondly, by providing an alternative career as a fallback option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... human’s lives in technology, philosophy ,and many other fields. For instance, fam...
^^
Line 3, column 1013, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...many, technological advancements like T.V, internet and mobile phones, would not ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53444180523 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0308192907 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58432304038 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.5135340559 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.909090909 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120824523887 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334769961969 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369121062058 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701960554448 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127838300645 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.