In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
College students are required to take a variety of courses apart from their intended majors. Some colleges offer the students to enroll in the music, literature such as poems and novels, and other types of imaginative literature courses. The prompt quickly supports this idea and claims that all colleges should force their students to undertake these courses. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the statement of the prompt and I am going to illustrate my opinion with three specific reasons.
First of all, not all the colleges can afford to accommodate these literature courses. Enforcing all students to enroll in poetry or mythology courses actually force all the institutions to arrange necessary facilities which may not be economically viable for all institutions. For example, there are many colleges which are struggling with financial crisis and it will create more pressure on their shoulder to include these courses in their curriculum. They need to hire specialized faculty members, need to purchase books and keep them in the library and so on. If they plan to increase the semester fees, many students will no longer be interested to study in that college. Therefore, it will not be a practical decision to necessitate all the college students to participate in various imaginative literature courses.
Secondly, students may not be interested to learn about poems, myths or literature in their college life. More specifically, when the college students discover that they are bound to enroll in some courses, they will eventually loose their interests to learn something from those sessions. Unlike the school or kindergarten students, college students are grown-ups and they like to take the courses that attract them. For instance, I was passionate about science and scientific discovery from the very early of my childhood. So, whenever my college forced me to take musical instrument session, I hardly attended those sessions and eventually I did not learn anything from that course. On the contrary, during my university life, I became a member of the university music club to learn more about music during my free time. Therefore, forcing a student to attend the classes which he does not prefer, will not be fruitful at all and so it should not be encouraged.
Last but not the least, it may sound harsh but it is a fact that the knowledge of imaginative literature hardly helps someone to contribute to the welfare of the country or to make someone competent in the job market. In the real life scenario, students need to be technically sound and they need to showcase their proficiency in the demanding courses such as engineering or accounting, medical or any relevant courses. Therefore, forcing the students to learn these imaginative literature courses actually enables the wastage of their times and thus makes them less capable. When the country needs the erudition of a technical expert to solve a critical problem, what will be the use of a poem writer at that moment?
To conclude, forcing the college students to enroll in the imaginative literature courses will not be a great idea and thus I am strongly against the idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...l in some courses, they will eventually loose their interests to learn something from...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, for instance, of course, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2656.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10769230769 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77936181002 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467307692308 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 848.7 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3041813706 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86363636364 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259883634952 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858399252166 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595814217262 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155624811925 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501162390417 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.