The task at hand is to discuss the effect of technology on the cognitive and creative abilities of humans. I completely disagree with the fact that increasing technology will deteriorate thinking capability. Rather, in recent times, it has only shown to increase productivity and ease in solving problems and not the reverse.
First of all, let us look at the role of technology in the context of the Industrial Revolution. The productivity obtained in all fields, including agriculture, factories, craftsmanship, transportation boomed in terms of efficiency. Advanced tools like telescopes helped astronomers verify their hypotheses. In all of the cases, humans were relying on technology to make their lives easier and more productive. However, in contrast to the statement made, it didn’t affect the thinking capabilities, as new inventions and discoveries popped up as the scientists had amazing tools at their disposal which they used to boost their theories. Invention of electricity has made a lot of technology alive today, in the sense that electricity is used everywhere around us these days. These inventions helped humanity as a whole to make tremendous progress in the last couple of centuries as compared to any other time period.
In the current era, technology is all around us, starting from the automatic coffee maker which prepares a hot cup of coffee when I wake up, to the all-knowing smartphone that finds the fastest route to office in an unexpected road jam while the presentation is being synced with the remote server, all while glancing through the news of what’s happening around the world. All this technology has helped us a lot in terms of balancing everyday life. It may seem that all this automation has made people more careless and that their long-term memory may be impaired as they rely more on alarms, reminders, sticky notes, and so on. But this statement is flawed in the sense that the same technology has opened up a myriad of possibilities to solve more problems, thus opening up the problem-solving capabilities. As we progress towards more and more conceptually challenging problems, we would need more computation, data, algorithms, and soft-skills at our disposal. Rapid strides in technology is already providing us with enormous amounts of data and computation, but the thinking and innovation is ameliorated by the same ideas that led to the invention of both hardware and software. Satellites are allowing us to probe into the depths of space, and as the study of astronomy gives us more evidence, we are compelled to find out more about it. The evidence plays a crucial role in understanding how things work, and this leads to new ideas and theories, which in turn leads to new inventions, and faster and better methods.
On the other side, in a more common setting, people use technology in their daily lives without having to compromise on thinking capabilities. Using calculators, for instance, doesn’t hinder the mathematical intuition behind addition, or multiplication, but it obviates the need for arduous and boring work of calculations by hand, especially for large-scale computations. Humans are not “programmed” for large scale computations, something which computers are very good at. Rather, we humans possess the strongest of all computations, i.e. innovation and creativity, something which technology cannot create by itself, at least in the near future. This aspect of humans is only enhanced by machinery since it saves time, power, energy, and human resources, instead of deteriorating it. Propulsion of innovation and movement towards a better and advanced civilization is possible only through making terrific changes in the current amount of technology we possess, and use it in an appropriate way.
Thus, using technology to solve problems aids in our ability to compute and saves us time, energy, and resources. It is extremely efficient at performing things that we cannot perform fast. On the contrary to what some people may think, it doesn’t hinder thinking abilities, rather, it ameliorates it when used in the right way. It is one of the building blocks to a better and more sound civilization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...ative abilities of humans. I completely disagree with the fact that increasing technology will deteriorate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...astronomers verify their hypotheses. In all of the cases, humans were relying on technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 992, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nt of technology we possess, and use it in an appropriate way. Thus, using technology to solve pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, thus, while, at least, for instance, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 107.0 58.6224719101 183% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3548.0 2235.4752809 159% => OK
No of words: 673.0 442.535393258 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27191679049 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09335287823 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14591808576 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 344.0 215.323595506 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511144130758 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1126.8 704.065955056 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8499017147 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0357142857 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82142857143 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25642649428 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661872320177 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464028528412 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142145241377 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356689515042 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 188.0 100.480337079 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.