We are living in a world where technology is enhancing day-by-day, every problem is being solved, but I agree with the point-as people rely more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves deteriorate.
Firstly, In our ancient days people were bored of eating tasteless raw food and they wanted to find some method to make their food tasty –this led to the invention of fire.
Secondly, To communicate with others, we used birds and later letters came up, but all this took a lot of time to deliver a message-This led to the invention of emails, fax etc.
Here the fact is many suffered having tasteless raw food, communicating with others and these people used to think of some solution that makes their suffering reduce to at least some extent. But now-a–days there are all facilities and human can lead a comfortable life, as they are comfortable they don’t think much and just use the technology. But this is not true in all cases because they are few people who think of improving the existing technologies.
Finally I wanted to conclude is only few people have great thinking as they want to improve their present, but many are becoming lazy with all the comforts available and are using others inventions to make their life comfortable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
...irstly, In our ancient days people were bored of eating tasteless raw food and they want...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...improving the existing technologies. Finally I wanted to conclude is only few people...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing lazy with all the comforts available and are using others inventions to make ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, at least, in all cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 2235.4752809 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 221.0 442.535393258 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90045248869 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67721921271 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606334841629 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 704.065955056 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4528910505 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.714285714 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.21951772744 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168581720779 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838959483683 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107374680264 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102658682862 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122978819025 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.