As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
I consierably agree with this statement - yes, our being dependent on the technology for each and every aspect of life will weaken the ability of mind.
The cognitive caliber of humans will reduce to a great extent, because of not being used. The simplest example of a basic production of technology - an archetype of calculations - the calculator, if used extensively, the brain will become contingent upon it for even fundamental maths consisting of addition, subtraction of not very large numbers. I have personally observed this in different shopkeepers, one who performs these financial calculations in mind has far more fertile brain than the others who use this machine for the same purpose.
Another example - The mobile phone - people are so much accustomed to its use that they are unable to think of the rudimentary facts that sould be on the tips. E.g. To find out the directions (East, West, North, South), I have seen people immediately forage for their mobile phone, even when they are easily able to see the sun, and can therefore readily infer the directions.
But the technology has its own positive side, where it is helpful in myriad of complex situations and it should be utilized.
A man must remember that he created the technology and the mind is more stronger than technology, if he stops using his mind, the advancement of technology will also wane. Relying on the technology should be balanced and the mind should be given its own space.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 68, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
... created the technology and the mind is more stronger than technology, if he stops using his ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., if, so, therefore, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 246.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0081300813 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76013106911 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626016260163 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1317951355 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.888888889 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212384230946 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790090406362 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318193900766 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102135673795 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416448235751 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.