As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate
As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will not deteriorate. Technology is just a tool for people to solve their problems. Surely, technology will change the way people work, but not decrease their ability.
Technology came as a way for solving the problems existed in human society. For example, before calculators, basic mathmatics i.e. addition, subtration were done by hand using sticks. Later, calculator made this rigorous task some tap of buttons. Though it is true that, people are not giving enough effort for this simple calculation, they are using their effort and the technology for solving more complex problems.
When there was no fire, human used their ability of thinking to find a solution to create fire by stones. Then, human were in search for the way of cooking by this fire. After years of improvement, in present, we use highly effective stoves to cook our foods. Considering invention of fire through stones a technology, human ability did not stop, rather improved day by day based on that.
Presently, we are using technology in everything. The use of technology is making our life more enjoyable and easy. But our problems of life keep arising. So, we use the existing technology to solve the latest problem and keep going.
But, if in a hypothetical situation, where technology will exceed human talent, it is possible that we do nothing except our mere biological needs like eating. Only then, the ability of humans to think for themselves will cease.
Thus, until then, using technology is not deteriorating rather stimulating our thinking process for the upcoming invention.
- a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 33
- business manager decision about program 50
- leadership needs cooperation than competition 50
- taking decision on movie customer decreasing 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, thus, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25724637681 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03639617694 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.9283863802 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452730722614 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166685895786 0.0831039109588 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198140986705 0.0758088955206 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24041720922 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171071759108 0.0667264976115 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.