As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explainhow these considerations shape your position.
Technology, by definition, is the application of science to solve human problems. Despite the assertions of many that technology debilitates human thinking abilities, the ability of humans to think for themselves cannot decline because of their dependence on technology. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that technology does not preclude human abilities to think for themselves. Technology fosters critical thinking in humans as the developments and implementations of technology require research and human control.
First, Technology has taken up many mundane jobs, leaving us time to engage in more critical thinking. Describing a typical day, a hypothetical worker leaves home to his workspace in a car. There is a high chance that he will use the computer to carry out some tasks and make out time to communicate with the family he left at home. On the other hand, without technology, it will take more time to move from the house to the workplace, exhausting to carry out some tasks manually, and even almost impossible to communicate with the family at home while at work.
Second, the development and implementation of technology require critical thinking. For example, the recent global pandemic, Covid-19 has been managed so far through the inventions of vaccines that is helpful in suppressing the virus. the research was undertaken and the results were tested before the approval of these vaccines.
In conclusion, it is clear that people's reliance on technology to solve problems does not debilitate human ability to think for themselves, rather, it frees up more time to think critically and also creative thinking is necessary for the development and implementation of technology. However, everyday technologies such as calculators have the ability to decrease our ability to perform simple calculations, a "use it or lose it'' approach to thinking ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...at is helpful in suppressing the virus. the research was undertaken and the results...
^^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ability to perform simple calculations, a 'use it or lose it approach to thi...
^
Line 4, column 434, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'approaches'?
Suggestion: approaches
...calculations, a 'use it or lose it approach to thinking ability.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38513513514 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09207822865 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2830937713 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270191114483 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091321190239 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776856479082 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154629535015 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904378650763 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.