The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching, by definition, is an act of imbibing ideas or principles usually by an authority. These ideas and principles can be taught in several ways and as such there can't be one best way. The claim has taken a side to recommend appraisal of the positive actions and turns a deaf ear to the wrong action to be the best way to teach.
In as much as positive actions should be approbated, Negative actions should not be given deaf ears as doing this can be misleading as such there should be a penalty for negative actions. For example, consider a hypothetical classroom filled with the student, if some students always take out time to do all classwork assigned by their tutor whereas others remain adamant in doing theirs, rewarding those who are consistent in doing their classwork and ignoring the other set who would prefer not attempting the work is not enough action to make them consider doing it next time.
It is true that appraisal of the good act can motivate those who have done well to keep doing good and a well encourages others to do good so as to be approbated. Such motivation cannot be overemphasized in the workplace where a certain target has been set by the employers to be met by their staff. Everyone strives to meet their targets as most times failure to do such can mean demotion and even termination of appointment, whereas those who met theirs will be promoted and these come with other benefits as increment in salary and allowances.
In conclusion, there can't be one best way to teach, and as much as an appraisal of positive actions can help motivate both the doer to keep on with the good work and others to follow suit, giving deaf ears to a wrong act is not enough to stop wrongdoing. Further measures aim at penalizing such actions should be put in place to curb this menace completely so as not to lure more people into such acts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...aught in several ways and as such there cant be one best way. The claim has taken a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...and a well encourages others to do good so as to be approbated. Such motivation cannot b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y and allowances. In conclusion, there cant be one best way to teach, and as much a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...g act is not enough to stop wrongdoing. Further measures aim at penalizing such actions...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, as to, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5625 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55844211639 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505952380952 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.9162964751 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.3 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114842268765 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566054568663 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603723046209 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863586930654 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493463223376 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.