Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research has proven to be the greatest help and the worst weapon for mankind. No doubt its pros and cons are dicey however, I am of the opinion that Government should put in place a few restrictions on scientific findings and development.
Firstly, Consider the invention of the atomic bomb for example. This is one deadly invention that can wipe away lives and properties within a split second due to its highly destructive nature. Its destructive ability is incomprehensible. However, in times of war, atomic bombs have proven to be very effective based on their ability to completely render an area lifeless in no time.
Secondly, most leading world economies today are dependent on scientific research and development. Take for instance China with minimal Government restrictions is leading worldwide in the production of phones, laptops, gadgets e.t.c. No doubt this invention contributes to China's economy and every day the younger generations are encouraged to dive into developing new research and development of new technology further forming young researchers with vast ideologies and capabilities.
Thirdly, there are a lot of genetically enhanced seeds and foods. With the increasing rise in terminal diseases, there is need to regulate genetically enhanced seeds and foods. The need for government regulations in the agricultural sector cannot be overemphasized in as much as there is a need to enhance our foods so that we can meet the demands of the burgeoning population, there should be restrictions on the level of enhancements done to avoid long term health issues.
In conclusion, scientific research and development are desirable, but there should be some form of Government restrictions to keep scientists in check to avoid inventions that are destructive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39145907473 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16700786715 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576512455516 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.1852469371 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.21951772744 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178398415912 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583644057354 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588389441728 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106828714113 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064339258629 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.