Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research has proven to be the greatest help and the worst weapon for mankind. No doubt its pros and cons are dicey however, I am of the opinion that Government should put in place a few restrictions on scientific findings and development.
Firstly, Consider the invention of the atomic bomb for example. This is one deadly invention that can wipe away lives and properties within a split second. Its destructive ability is incomprehensible. However, without scientific research, there would be nothing like an atomic bomb.
Secondly, most leading world economies today are dependent on scientific research and development. Take for instance China with minimal Government restrictions is leading worldwide in the production of phones, laptops, gadgets e.t.c. No doubt this invention contributes to China's economy and every day the younger generations are encouraged to dive into developing new research and development of new technologies on a daily basis.
Thirdly, there are a lot of genetically enhanced seeds and foods. The need for government regulations in the agricultural sector cannot be overemphasized in as much as there is a need to enhance our foods so that we can meet the demands of the burgeoning population, there should be restrictions on the level of enhancements done to avoid long term health issues.
In conclusion, scientific research and development are desirable, but there should be some form of Government restrictions to keep scientists in check to avoid inventions that are destructive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 239.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.410041841 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20929502964 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594142259414 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.2545614066 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.545454545 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 5.21951772744 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194081153595 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064803719562 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556115094065 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110372199363 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540491502297 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.