As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology, by definition, is the application of scientific knowledge to the practical aims of human life and is indeed burgeoning. I disagree with the claim that human dependence on technology will make their thinking ability debilitate. Rather, technology fosters critical thinking in humans as the development and implementation of technology requires a lot of research and human control.
First, Technology has taken up lots of mundane jobs leaving us with time to engage in more critical thinking. Describing a typical day, a hypothetical worker leaves home to his workspace in a car. There is a high chance that he will use the computer to carry out some tasks and make out time to communicate with the family he left at home. On the other hand, without technology, it will take more time to move from the house to the workplace, exhausting to manually carry out some tasks, and even almost impossible to communicate with the family at home while at work.
Second, the development and implementation of technology require critical thinking. For example, the recent global pandemic, Covid-19 has been managed so far through the inventions of vaccines that is helpful in suppressing the virus. Several research was undertaken and the results were tested before the approval of these vaccines.
In conclusion, people's reliance on technology to solve problems does not debilitate human ability to think for themselves rather, it frees up more time to think critically and also creative thinking is necessary for the development and implementation of technology. However, everyday technologies such as calculators have the ability to decrease our ability to perform simple calculations, a "use it or lose it'' approach to thinking ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some research'.
Suggestion: Some research
...at is helpful in suppressing the virus. Several research was undertaken and the results were tes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ability to perform simple calculations, a 'use it or lose it approach to thi...
^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'approaches'?
Suggestion: approaches
...calculations, a 'use it or lose it approach to thinking ability.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30685920578 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08160333466 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0562335803 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256803904227 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857160143945 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862301433472 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147531512531 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862287100759 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.