As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology has revolutionize our life. We can travel thousands of miles in one day, walk on the moon for the first time, and communcate with family far away. Although it allows us to accomplish things unimagable to past geneartions, there is a price for humanity to pay by relying so heavily on techonology. As people rely heavily on technology to solve their problems, we gradually lose the ability to solve these problems ourself.
If you never solving problem without technology, how do you develop the mental muscle to tackle a problem by yourself? If you ask a group of random US college students to perform a multiplication of two double digit number in their head, they may have a hard time figuring out the solution. In comparision, it is very common for middle schoolers in China to quickly give you the answers. The problem is US students heavily rely on calculator to do their math opeartions, therefore they never develop the necessary mental muscle to do such a multiplication in their head. Another exmaple is that many college student rely heavily on online grammer checker to solve their grammer mistake.
When there is such a easy solution, why would they bother to develop the mental muscle to proofread their own writing? If technology is always aviailable, people will not exert enough efforts to
develop the mental muscle themselves.
To a hammer, all things looks as if they're needles. Relying on techonology change the way people think about a problem. When better techonology could immediately lead to better performance, people may be tempted to imporve on their techonolgy instead of improving their skill to solve complex problem with simple tools. For example, a problem of "ln(2-x) = 5" could be solved by arraging your math problem into "x= 2-e^5", and then this answer could be plug into a simple calautor. But a fancy calculator that costs hundreds of dollars is capable of solving complex equation could solve "ln(2-x) = 5" as it is. If people rely on using the best technology to magically solve all their problems, they're not truly learning the art of solving problems, and only focusing on improving external tools instead of focusing on learning
Solely relying on technology could lead to people to not develeoping mental muscle to solve problems, and lead people to focus on improvement of technology only and not focus on learning to imporve their skill. This is not to claim technology is all evil, but people have to learn to master technology as a tool for aiding, and not as a tool for doing. People can't let technology do all the work, while they just blindly staring at the technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'revolutionized'.
Suggestion: revolutionized
Technology has revolutionize our life. We can travel thousands of mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ir grammer mistake. When there is such a easy solution, why would they bother to...
^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...s. To a hammer, all things looks as if theyre needles. Relying on techonology change ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... to magically solve all their problems, theyre not truly learning the art of solving p...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 361, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ng, and not as a tool for doing. People cant let technology do all the work, while t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98651685393 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75398677252 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485393258427 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7631882825 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.789473684 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4210526316 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47368421053 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23792789199 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778014537586 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501449386694 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112167048298 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643025567005 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.