As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology has significant influence on mankind which is not limited to only assistance but also endangers the thinking skills. Therefore, the writer mostly agrees with the statement that peoples' reliance on technology for problem solving is reducing their intrapersonal thinking skills.
In recent times, it has been observed that artificial intelligence is taking over the world with it's various and multipurpose usage. Users from almost all sectors such as, health, education, business, economy, textile, engineering, literature and films etc. are getting assistance from AI to solve critical and complex problems. As data and pattern are stored in clouds, market driven approaches are easier to take strategies and implement actions. For example, by tracking the behavior of social media users graphic designers can create specific contents and websites to reach the target audience and promote their activities.
Additionally, technology can take logical actions if certain conditions are provided. Sometimes people cannot take rational decisions based on the given context and tend to take biased decisions. Therefore, objectivity can be ensured if people rely on technology to mitigate the crisis moment. For instance, while applying for any job, aptitude of the applicants can be measured through computer aided tests from the real life cases. In this way, personal preference can not create impact in decision making.
However, it is quite hard to fully depend on technology for solving problems. As human beings are subjective by nature and real life based approach is needed in every sector, technology cannot replace the value of humanistic thinking. For example, students might complete their assignments using AI but a teacher must keep track on the student's through continuous and performance based authentic assessment. Without interacting with the student and thinking deeply on the regular activities, will not be able to evaluate the students.
To conclude, it can be said that technology might facilitate the way of living but it can not be interchanged with the humanistic thinking skills. Because the world is run by thinkers rather than technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g their intrapersonal thinking skills. In recent times, it has been observed th...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...audience and promote their activities. Additionally, technology can take logica...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not create impact in decision making. However, it is quite hard to fully depen...
^^^
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inking deeply on the regular activities, will not be able to evaluate the student...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not be able to evaluate the students. To conclude, it can be said that technol...
^^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed with the humanistic thinking skills. Because the world is run by thinkers rather tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5843373494 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82560303574 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617469879518 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0527380449 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208959123747 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623461066945 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058086122479 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117840078627 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642930414378 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.38706741573 124% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.