People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posi

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

People may argue that the involvement of emotions in making decisions is a foolish thing to do as it could create a fog that conceals logic from participating in decision making. Emotions can mislead us from our knowledge which we have accumulated over the years from all the experience and studying we have done over the years. When we tend to get emotional, it might seem that, or emotion is all that matters in this world. While it is true that we should not always let emotion overshadow our judgment to the point that we defy logic, the involvement of emotion in decision making is actually an important part of making a good decision.
When we make decisions that are not actually logically justified and are based on our emotions alone, we are likely to make poor decisions. We may make decisions that are emotionally biased and later justify them with manipulated facts. For instance, consider we are hiring a computer engineer for a company, out of the two final candidates that have been narrowed down in recruitment process: one a seemingly excellent candidate for the job, with all the impressive alma matters, impressive work experience and profound knowledge in aspects such as programming and networking, and the other with a decent academic background, little experience and expertise, definitely a less capable candidate, but our close relative. In this situation, if we hire the later candidate and justify by saying that the first candidate was too perfect and would eventually leave (an excuse), just because we have empathy for the person we know, we are making a mistake.
However, this is not always the case. If we decide based on emotion but can justify it with proper logical reasoning, out decision might not be a poor one. After all, it has a proper logical reason behind it, and in addition to that, it is also emotionally fulfilling. This could, in fact, be a decision, that is even better than a one made just based on logical evidence.
Moreover, provided that the decision is logically sound, involving emotion in the decision can actually be the better thing to do. Emotions are what separates us, human beings, from other creatures of the world. We have humanity: emotions such as kindness, compassion, which forms the basis for our ethics. Consider a scenario where a village in a valley, surrounded by hills from all sided is suffering from drought, and there is no water anywhere in the valley, so people now have to start digging the hills to get water from a pond that lies on the other side of hills. In such a situation if you are the only one who can sell digging equipment, and people are willing to pay any price as if their lives depend on it, what would be the better thing to do? To charge them with unreasonable prices and loot them all you want? or to show compassion over dying people and sell shovels at a reasonable price? Is it justifiable that a decision is well thought but morally wrong? Well obviously, considering your emotions and considering for people is the better thing to do.
Therefore, even though we should not let emotions cloud our judgments, involving them in our decision-making process.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 828, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...able prices and loot them all you want? or to show compassion over dying people an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, after all, as to, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2619.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80550458716 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68919349178 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471559633028 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.855971294 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.045454545 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7727272727 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13636363636 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280013220673 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097805387318 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713738495333 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1641386799 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346660247826 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.