People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers
I agree with the statement that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. I believe that decisions about anything should always be taken after logically considering all the aspects of the situation and not just on a whim. The following points will elucidate my stance.
I believe that people who make decisions on the basis of emotions and then try to justify them by logic, are just finding reasons to provide support for their decision that they did not take by carefully and logically evaluating their options. They feel like they need to defend their decisions because they were taken while thinking emotionally. Any kind of decisions, big or small, have an effect on your life or maybe on others as well. These decisions should be considered by evaluating all the aspects of the situation.
When we don't evaluate a situation logically in the initial stages itself, then we will not be able to find the precious balance between the logic and emotion and be swayed away by the emotions. Humans are emotional beings and these emotions can be a huge factor in a lot of our decisions. But what is important is to be able to think emotionally and logically together. Decisions based solely on emotions or solely based on logic, may not be the best decisions in our favor.
I agree, emotions play a huge role in all of our decisions but not getting swayed away by these emotions and thinking logically before making any decision, is what will prove best for us. It is also possible that sometimes logic evades us completely and we make a decision purely on our emotions and that may even work in our favor at times. People often say, follow your heart. It means that we should put logic aside for the time being and think from our heart and let the emotions rule our decisions. This can prove beneficial at times as well. We might end up doing something that we would never have done if we were thinking logically and that may have even been the best decision in our lives. For eg, making a decision for an impromptu trip across the country or selecting a vocation that gives us the most amount of satisfaction and not thinking about any decision logically. These decisions can be life altering and can sometimes prove beneficial for us but they can have an equally negative effect as well. Thus, the decisions based solely on emotions can go either way and there is no guarantee that they will work out in our favor. And finding logic in these decisions is just like making excuses for yourself because you don't want to admit that the decision may not have been logically sound.
In conclusion, I agree that sometimes the decisions governed by pure emotions can be the best decisions in our lives but, more often than not we try to defend these decisions with logic later on just to convince ourselves and others that the decision was cogent enough. If we keep doing this with all of our decisions, then theat will make us poor decision makers as we will always be giving justifications for our decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...aspects of the situation. When we dont evaluate a situation logically in the i...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...making excuses for yourself because you dont want to admit that the decision may not...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 33.0505617978 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70165745856 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4548713145 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414364640884 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0521895433 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6086956522 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08695652174 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479910751198 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165011294006 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174983205256 0.0758088955206 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343527402754 0.150359130593 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134899853639 0.0667264976115 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.