Progress is best made through discussion among people who have contrasing points of view.
The writer contends that progress is best made through discourse and debate among people who have contrasting viewpoints. I strongly agree with the writer's assertion. In every realms of human endeavor, whether in science, social reform or policy, progress is best made through discourse and debate between who shares contrasting viewpoints.
First of all, restrospective to the past, social reform and policy is best made through debate and discourse. In united states and Britan, as far as I know, prior to implementing any social policy, debate and discourse happens much between the people who have opposite viewpoints. For example, in US, there is a group who believe global warming is a hoax, and there is also anthere group who believes it is not hoax, rather it is real. The discourse and debate happens sometime and opposing person try to establish their viewpoints, thruough this they come into the conclusion that it is not a hoax, after presenting lot of evidences and scrutinizing them. So it has playing a pivotal role.
Second of all, the importance of debate and discussion doesn't confine on only social sector, it as cardinal importance in Science as well. I remember, when I was in a University, some of us used to believe that Newton't second law is not correct where some of our professor and our friends were absolutely in favor with this law. We organized a conclave through which we came into the conclusion that, it is not entirely fasle as we believed but it is not also entirely true either. It varies upon the situation.
In sum, as the writere asserts, progress is best made through discussion among the people who shares contrasting viewpoints, I agree that it is the basic foundation of progress. Without this, in any sector, it is hard to go into the best conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...g viewpoints. I strongly agree with the writers assertion. In every realms of human end...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her in science, social reform or policy, progress is best made through discourse ...
^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the importance of debate and discussion doesnt confine on only social sector, it as ca...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, well, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92131147541 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73636759327 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501639344262 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3719252695 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.214285714 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303733414351 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107202398976 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146063841478 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21737105693 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137485916858 0.0667264976115 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.