The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Every human being has a real talent in at least one field. Talent is something which makes you different from a room full of people. A real talent is only recognised and acknowledged by few people but those who are able to identify this will surly succeed in life. The author prompts that the real talent of a popular musician cannot be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generation. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with the prompt due to the following reasons.
Firstly, a person is often underestimated by the others untill he does not succeed in life and even after he does some critics are going to rebuke. For instance, Micheal Jackson was a world famous musician and dancer but his real talent was accurately assessed and appreciated only after he died. He is now considered as epitome of musician and dancer but still he was criticized severly when he was at his peak of the career. The above example illustrates that eventhough the kudos musician has achieved everything in the life but still failed to gain acceptance in the society for his real talent untill he was dead.
On the contrary, one argue's that a real talent of the musician will be recognized in just a matter of time and gains attention quickly. For example, Justin Beiber is a famous musician who's talent was appreciated at the age of 17. The critics gave an honest assessment purely on basis of talent. He was loved by a lot of fans but due to his narcisstic and presumptous attitude which rised immediately after getting glory he was castigated not only by fans but also by critics who one's appreciated his real talent. Hence, this exemplifies that real talent can be jeopardised as soon as fame starts to interfere the honest assessment.
To recapitulate, there may be few who argue's that a real musician can only be adulterated and extolled once he/she is dead for several generations while the rest disagrees the viewpoint of the prompt as a real talent can also be easily recognized within no time and can also be reproached as soon as fame interfere's with the honest assessment. Hence, it is dubious to generalise an opinion based on one-sided facts. Therefore, the prompt of the passage remains skeptical and open for further arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'several generations'.
Suggestion: several generations
...ed until the musician has been dead for several generation. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kudos'' or 'kudo's'?
Suggestion: kudos'; kudo's
...example illustrates that eventhough the kudos musician has achieved everything in the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...ple, Justin Beiber is a famous musician whos talent was appreciated at the age of 17...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, at least, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7641025641 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67958409836 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4991349426 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.294117647 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421254240552 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136939547694 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130614052672 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263648699631 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452836812353 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.