Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.
Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of an action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing that action
An individual always tries to perform an action which shows himself/herself as a good person. The morality of a person is indeterminable if he/she performs an action which turns out to be beneficial. The author claims that an action is morally correct if amount of good result is greater than the amount of bad results from action. In my opinion, i mostly disagree with the prompt as an individual's moral cannot be judged based on the results of an action. Hence, i mostly disagree due to following reasons.
Firstly, a famous author once said that "a person will strive to show oneself as a good person not because his intent of performing an action is good instead people expect good from him". For example, a politician will perform all the dark activities in the shadow but he performs all the good activities in front of the media since his reputation is the most concerned factor determining his carrier. The above example illustrates that the outcome of an action does not signify the moral behaviour of an individual.
Additionally, the author's claim is somewhat true as there are people who are son of the god as they intent to serve for the betterment of the society. For instance, doctors put their best to save a person's life and if he does save one then he is considered as good Shepherd while if he doesn't then hypocrates are the one who chastises him. From the above example, one can infer that an action is morally correct if the results are efficacious. This bolsters the author claim and support the reason of the claim as well.
Further, moral behaviour is often a dubious phenomenon to define and one cannot be in a position to scrutinize any individual's intention as morality is something which cannot be determined by a judgemental eye.
Obviously, there will be some who will argue that the results of an action plays a vital role in producing the correctness of a moral action. However, the rest will assert that a morally correct action fails to determine the intent of a person performing the action. Hence, one should believe in his inner voices and act accordingly and not by performing an action which depends on the current situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...im is somewhat true as there are people who are son of the god as they intent to serve ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tance, doctors put their best to save a persons life and if he does save one then he is...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...considered as good Shepherd while if he doesnt then hypocrates are the one who chastis...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...nnot be in a position to scrutinize any individuals intention as morality is something whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79575596817 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71992085368 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472148541114 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.987387877 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501953779111 0.243740707755 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207053173684 0.0831039109588 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202063314261 0.0758088955206 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281355522272 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188877872766 0.0667264976115 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.