Action speaks louder than words, of course it is true to the context that morally good actions have positive impacts on the society. The prompt claims that an action that results in good than bad is inclined to be correct comparing the end results. In my opinion, I agree completely with the reason for the claim. In fact, there are three main reasons behind accepting the claim proposed.
Firstly, a political gain over a particular territory for the good of it's citizens is often required for the welfare and the development of the nation. Sometimes a well disciplined person gerrymander a particular state in order to gain political hegemony over the area. The aftermath of this can surely bring a great change in the entire cultural and sustainability to the territorial people. For instance, a patriot who gains a political dominance over his clan of people is sure to show his ability to encourage patriotism among his subjects and is equally inclined to bring about a golden period of rule for his people.
Sometimes a small nation surrender to a big nation to subside the internal problems or riots among the people, Thus, for the betterment of it's citizen a small nation like Hong-Kong signed agreement with China to enjoy the benefits of smart development of the nation and it's citizens.
The next reason for accepting the claim is the economical gain acquired by common people. People are more susceptible to corruption and bribery in a vast society where there are no proper invigilators available. Often times, people take advantage over the situation to earn money. For instance, a farmer takes better advantage of the season in which he grow crops. In India, monsoons are the season when farmers expect rain and channels for irrigation. Despite the fact that agriculture considered to be the backbone of the country, farmers make hay whenever the sun shines. Suitable climatic conditions and proper demand maintenance, plays a vital role for the economical gain of the farmers. Similarly, people around the world attain profits whenever opportunities knock at their doorsteps.
Finally, People are opportunistic to acquire financial gains. Even though it is a question of sustainability, people save money for their future, especially for the generations to come. For instance, Playing a fair role in investing through share markets whenever the situations are favorable. People are either expected to predict the share price well in advance or loss in to the share play. This is one situation where the community is expected to play morally under certain circumstance to gain a huge profit.
To recapitulate, few people may argue about the other side of accepting the claim. However, a principle based action for personal gain or betterment of the society is required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 354, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'grows'.
Suggestion: grows
...ter advantage of the season in which he grow crops. In India, monsoons are the seaso...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, may, similarly, so, thus, well, for instance, in fact, of course, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1135371179 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78790439217 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541484716157 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7730002722 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5833333333 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136541594074 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430976049848 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957137444787 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911643149226 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147680239151 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.