Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo

Educational institutions plays a key role in moulding the future of students. A best educational institution could be the most incredible gift for a student's holistic development in life. I completely disagree with the prompt about universities or colleges discouraging students in the field of study, where a student is anticipated to be a failure. Infact, education must prove the fact that "Failures are the stepping stones to success". Hopefully, education and educational institutions have been a game changer to a large section of the people around the globe.
Educational institutions and it's practitioner should appeal to the students in a way that, even the apathetic students must quickly start to pick up interest with sheer confidence. Universities must arrange a special counselling to galvanize the least accomplishing students to constructively build hopes in the field they have chosen to study. The institution must accommodate rooms for questionnaire sessions with these students frequently. It paves way for the betterment of relationship between the professors and the slow learners. Such that, there are possibilities for the disinterested pupils to build confidence in the subjects they have chosen to pioneer.
Furthermore, slow and steady learners must take the role of a professor to take seminars to other students. Thus, they can develop their confidence and improve their life skills. Therefore, universities must act wisely in a way to encourage people rather than showing detests towards the least interested students.
Lastly, universities must play a predominant role in energizing the students. Partialities and grouping the pupils can enervate the least interested pupils. There can be a collaborative efforts from the students and practitioners. Therefore, students who lacks interest may not develop further aversions.
To conclude, the prompt given seems to showcase irresponsibility. In my opinion, an education institution must work on responsible principles to handle it's students progressively.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...ole in moulding the future of students. A best educational institution could be t...
^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...n could be the most incredible gift for a students holistic development in life. I complet...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effort'?
Suggestion: effort
...ed pupils. There can be a collaborative efforts from the students and practitioners. Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to handle its students progressively.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, thus, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72131147541 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41867706315 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554098360656 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5690465522 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8421052632 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0526315789 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172740534273 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533380937705 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431286632387 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944323045138 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486803892396 0.0667264976115 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.