Scandals are very common in today’s world. We come to know about various scams and scandals taking place in various parts of the world. According to the statement in the question, the scandals are useful as they focus our attention in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. I strongly oppose the view of the author because of the reasons and explanations discussed below.
Scandals can be useful in no ways. In fact the society has to suffer from a huge loss because of these scandals. Let us consider, for instance the scandal of Vijay Mallya last year in India. He had a huge amount of loan in the state bank of India and he flew away from his country at the time of repaying the loan. As a result, the bank had suffered from a huge economic crisis. In order to make up the crisis, the bank had increased the interest rate for the loans of general public. The government also had to help the bank with money to revive the original status of the bank. The economic support provided by the government of India could have been used for some development works of the country. Thus, indirectly the entire people of India were affected because of the scandal. Hence we can never consider the scandal as useful. Rather they are very much harmful for the society.
Again, we often come across some scandals, say, for instance, political leaders getting involved in a physical relationship with his secretaries, that are detrimental to the moral values of the society. These will destroy the values of the society. How can we consider these as useful?
Thus it can be inferred from the preceding discussion that scandals can never be useful. Rather these scandals are very harmful and detrimental to the society. In order to prevent these scandals from occurring in our society, the people should be taught the moral values since childhood. They should be taught how these scandals and scams are detrimental to the society and its people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ased the interest rate for the loans of general public. The government also had to help the ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...a were affected because of the scandal. Hence we can never consider the scandal as us...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 835, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...n never consider the scandal as useful. Rather they are very much harmful for the soci...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ow can we consider these as useful? Thus it can be inferred from the preceding d...
^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...sion that scandals can never be useful. Rather these scandals are very harmful and det...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, so, thus, as to, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76401179941 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4602654144 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498525073746 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0554807743 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4090909091 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4090909091 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187012167884 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598835558478 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796338938663 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119673633831 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760373624938 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.