Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I believe that scandal could be useful to excavate more truth than others and attract the public attention to the issue which could be never known before, and knowing more truth helps us make judgments correctly.
Many celebrities look so moral and well-behaved on the screen until the scandal erupted. Some of them pretend themselves having highly moral spirit and make an illusion with positive and kind imagine in the public. still, the truth behind the screen is sometime embarrassing. For example, the detrimental food oil production scandal of Ding-Ying Group erupted in taiwan, showing that the oil plant produces the poor quality, processed oil, and mixed with problematic ingredient which could have a negative impact on human body. Irony, the business owner always advocates his ambition to secure food safety and even establishes a faithful imagine as a Buddha believer. people haven’t realized the danger of the mixed oil as well as food safety until the scandal appearing on the news. The unveiled truth is so devious and shameful that the oil manufacturer owner was sanctioned and punished to the prisons. On the contrary, if there is no scandal reported, people could never know the truth and still eat the oil they produce. Thus, the scandal would be beneficial and valuable to public based in the case.
Opponents may argue that the scandal is unlikely to have positive impact or contribution to the society and become bickering in the end. For example, the british Prince scandal doesn’t make any contribution to the british society and people like to see the material just out of interest. Although they’re just curious about Prince’s underlying life, the scandal spreading create a lot of jobs. In other words, the scandal itself could be meaningless, but the task to disperse the scandal would be meaningful in a society. Furthermore, even if it is doing nothing, it has no negative effect on the public conspicuously.
Additionally, the scandal not only discloses the truth behind the screen, but also provides a clue which we could judge a person by. For instance, taiwan presidential election on 2020, there is a candidate Mr. han who has been supported by KMT. before joining the election, he was a major of Kaoshung and his ambition extended to president. During the election, he created a so liberal and capable imagine that people expect his great leadership if he wins the election. However, one scandal suddenly erupted regarding his affair showing that he gave 200 thousand us dollars to another women who is not his wife for buying a house. even the media has questioned frequently han about the affair and expect han to explain, but he never face the problem straightly and directly. there is no denying from han and it causes that public question his personality to be a president. In contrast, if there is no scandal, we never know that his personality behind the screen.
In conclusion, the scandal does function beneficially because of the underlying truth and a mechanism to examine a personality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Still
...ositive and kind imagine in the public. still, the truth behind the screen is sometim...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... faithful imagine as a Buddha believer. people haven’t realized the danger of the mixe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
... Mr. han who has been supported by KMT. before joining the election, he was a major of...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 632, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...who is not his wife for buying a house. even the media has questioned frequently han...
^^^^
Line 4, column 734, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'faces'.
Suggestion: faces
...and expect han to explain, but he never face the problem straightly and directly. th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 776, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ce the problem straightly and directly. there is no denying from han and it causes th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2545.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0396039604 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72930629136 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512871287129 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8305438354 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.041666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160119153472 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441296762765 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038823783688 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947559854128 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324516523191 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.