Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Most of the time we do not know the real face of people. Because, habitually, people disguise their true self. In that case scandals might help to know people's real demeanor. The speaker, in the prompt above, avers that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Though, in some cases, scandals are not fruitful, most of the cases it helps people to heed on problems that are vital in nature. Thus, I mostly agree with the statement above.
First of all, when scandals are made as calumny for sullying someone’s reputation, then it might not be useful. Rather It would destroy someone’s true potential. For instance, some people made scandals against Joe Biden, the president-elect of the United States, that his son was a drag addicted. It might be true that his son is, but It does not make any sense in regarding his presidency. Perhaps, It was an attempt for retaliation. In this particular situation, scandals, are not useful, rather It degrade the value of Joe Biden. These kind of scandals, in contrast, would make the person mentally depressed. In fact, he or she could commit suicide.
However, in most of the cases, situations where public policy or greater interest is related, scandals are pretty effective. For example, the Water-Gate scandals focus people attention on a major issue that should be taken into account seriously. Also, the scandals of Bill Clinton can be reasonable in this situation. The lately scandals of Donald Trump, where he colluded with Ukraine’s administration to gain advantage in regarding the 2020 election. If the scandals were not disseminated, Donald Trump, perhaps, might be the President again( though in an illegal way). Thus, in this situation scandals are important.
Moreover, before electing someone in a vital situation we need to know meticulously about the person we are electing. Most of the cases, as I stated above, they (political leaders) disguise their true face. If that is the case, then an scandal may reveal some paramount facts about the leaders which might be helpful for the people in electing the person.
In sum, there are few cases where scandals are not useful, but the benefits of scandals far outrun the inefficacy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...eputation, then it might not be useful. Rather It would destroy someone’s true potenti...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'degrades'?
Suggestion: degrades
...on, scandals, are not useful, rather It degrade the value of Joe Biden. These kind of s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...ther It degrade the value of Joe Biden. These kind of scandals, in contrast, would make th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an illegal way" with adverb for "illegal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ps, might be the President again though in an illegal way. Thus, in this situation scandals are i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ir true face. If that is the case, then an scandal may reveal some paramount facts...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in contrast, in fact, kind of, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02917771883 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65272678238 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53050397878 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3312069332 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7083333333 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18061268864 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497445732023 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809769867981 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975425661654 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657604248795 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.