So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts.
Driving Rules and regulations are critical to safety of the driver and others who are in the car. While many driver have self-awareness and dependable to obey the rules, others may think these rules are not important unless there are legal consequences of not fallowing them. SO, I think the argument which suggest that adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts, when they are aware of the danger involved is erratic and vague.
First, people vary of their conception of the danger levels. For example, while many people consider it necessary to put infants in their car seats while driving, others may feel it is not a must for short trip, and no danger involve. Thus, the rules and regulations is vital to state guidelines to the people while driving their cars, and legal action should be taken in the case of violation of these rules.
Second, accidents on the road can not be predicted all the time. Moreover, many drivers who drive fairly can be involved on deadly accidents. For instance, many drivers involve in accidents while their car is state. The driving experience is affected by other people on the streets, streets' conditions, weather conditions and many other factors, Which lessen the driver control on the level of danger.
Most importantly, rules and regulation should be restrict and cogent, to be more liable and effective. People tendency to fallow rules escalate when they feel it is restrict and legal actions would be a result of any illicit action.
For conclusion, while safety rules should be valid and restricted, people awareness of the importance of attain respect to these rule on their safety is urgent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun driver seems to be countable; consider using: 'many drivers'.
Suggestion: many drivers
...er and others who are in the car. While many driver have self-awareness and dependable to o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 50, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'restricted'?
Suggestion: restricted
...rtantly, rules and regulation should be restrict and cogent, to be more liable and effec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 166, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'restricted'.
Suggestion: restricted
...low rules escalate when they feel it is restrict and legal actions would be a result of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o these rule on their safety is urgent.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 279.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9605734767 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49586443827 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519713261649 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3923325638 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254991941209 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987864827192 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140735339932 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148813627671 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103166157857 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.