the society must prepare its younger generation for leadership in various sectors of the nations by instilling in them with the sense of cooperation rather than competition.
The future of a nation predominently depends on the younger generation that is prospering within the nations. The values they imbibe, will be foundation of the decisions they take in the time of responsibility. One of the cardinal values that a individual must possess in order to lead the organization they are heading, is leadership. This quality may be implemented in majorly two ways i.e. by sense of cooperation or it may be driven by competition. In my opinion, the sense of cooperation is more valuable and eloquent in almost every scenario as compared to the person driven by competition. I agree with the given statement that the society must prepare its younger generation for leadership in various sectors of the nations by instilling in them with the sense of cooperation rather than competition. In the following paragraphs we dig deeper into the issue and try to provide more credible support for the stand taken.
Firstly, preference of sense of cooperation over the competition is based on the fact that in a competitive environment, there exists lack of trust, harmony and cooperativeness, which I consider to be one of the major value that make us human, that have brought us where we are right now. A leader instilling the sense of cooperativeness will lead his team or organization to a higher level of success as compared to the one driven by competition. He/she will be trusted by his/her's subordinates which will bring prosperity to the organization.
Moving on, if the leader possess the value of cooperativeness, it will help propagate a healthy competition within the organization, which will further encourage more higher rates of growth of the organization. The employees lead by the leader will be giving their best efforts in order to take the organization to sky high levels. They will be working in a more comfortable environment. Whereas in a competitive environment, contrary situation prevails, thus attenuating the growth rates.
But in light of competitive environment there exists more zeal to get ahead of the world and be a paragon among the your rivals. Which in few cases, lacks in environment lead by a leader who believes in sense of cooperativeness. This slight lack in enthusiasm may be prove to be cardinal in deciding prosperity of the organization.
At the end I would like to say that I would always prefer sense of cooperation over the competition as there is a better environment in present of the cooperativeness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...bility. One of the cardinal values that a individual must possess in order to lea...
^
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two ways i.e. by sense of cooperation or it may be driven by competition. In my o...
^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...anization, which will further encourage more higher rates of growth of the organization. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'your'?
Suggestion: the; your
...ead of the world and be a paragon among the your rivals. Which in few cases, lacks in en...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, thus, whereas, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02682926829 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25163300391 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473170731707 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1161085515 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260626739628 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867389760764 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194946973446 0.0758088955206 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127585299486 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178631670543 0.0667264976115 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.