While it is true that corporations need to concentrate making as much profit as possible, they do have some degree of responsibility for the well being of the society. This is as much as it is true with any particular individual holding some responsibility towards the environment. Although it is breaking no law in defaulting on such responsibility, it is however the basic bare minimum we should do for the environment we live in, after all we are what our society and our environment is and the current situation of the environment is what we made it is.
In the case of big organisations and firms, the impact they can make on society, either good or bad will be profound given the scale of it. For instance, the environmental activities like beach cleanup drive, fund collection marathon, plantation drive, although small and costs next to nothing for them, will have a very beneficial impact on the environment. Recently, many organisations are tending towards such a society aware attitudes rather than being apathetic towards it, which is a good thing. Conspicuously, we would have missed these helpful things if not there is no such notion of responsibility in the corporations.
Further, if the attitude of having whole concentration only on money making without any concern towards society whatsoever would be pernicious. Such an attitude would often result in selfish activities with ulterior motives. For example, constructing big factories and industries without any consideration towards the environment had never brought good results to anyone apart from the firm owners. Moreover, it causes irreversible damage to rivers, wildlife, trees and eventually humans. Such instances are not rare in the history and clearly can be interpreted as results of having zero to none responsibility towards environment and would have been avoided or lessened if they felt accountable of their actions.
Furthermore, the classic conundrum of the disparity between rich and poor, rich getting richer and poor getting poorer can also be imputed towards this nonchalant nature of corporations which would have been obviated to an extent if corporations are responsible in educating the poor children and providing them with basic amenities.
However, having said this about the feeling of accountability and responsibility of corporations, they should not be blamed solely since at the end of the day it is the responsibility of every individual towards the society. Otherwise, any attempts by a corporation or a government to improve the society would only be ephemeral and eventually futile.
In conclusion, it can be agreed upon that, although corporations need to make money , they also have to be held accountable for their actions impacting society and be responsible in maintaining and improving the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
While it is true that corporations need ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...although corporations need to make money , they also have to be held accountable f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, after all, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33705357143 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18594527112 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513392857143 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3880727113 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.4375 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285723871917 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981847093714 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715869175861 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165916820426 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447650635053 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.