Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
How can corporations prioritize their social responsibility and endeavor to gain more revenue? Someone claims that corporations should undertake responsibility to promote well-beings of societies, while others believe that the only liability of corporations is to grasp with sufficient revenue under laws' permission. From my perspective, I tend to agree with the former considering long-term development of any enterprise, while I reserve my approval for the latter because of its potentially detrimental results.
Admittedly, to clasp with sufficient profit is necessary requisite for corporations' survival and further development. Therefore, it is necessary for any enterprises to drill with continual revenue for all possible opportunities in order to sustain their own flourish. On the contrary, without sufficient financial supports, companies might confront with dire straits: their own employees are likely to be in unemployment status and their government have to occupy other public funding to salvage their crisis. In this case, corporations fall into great burdens for society, rather than positive impetus. For supporting my viewpoint, we can no further look at Apple in 1960s. By dedicating with idealistic products decoupled with company's revenues, Apple lose the practically financial foundation to sustain its momentum for further developments and step into the verges of bankrupts. Only after Steve Job returned back to eradicate infeasible products, Apple was able to revive to and even surpass with its previous market position.
Despite significance of the pursuance with revenue, I have to argue that cooperation’s should also assume social liabilities. In this first place, any enterprises naturally involves with social issues, which could be settled by creating agreeable environment for both business itself and employees. With such environment harmonizing with society, business could possess better development milieu, while employees are able to fully engage with their own work. Conversely, merely focusing on profit-driven endeavors could lead to detrimental results on employees and employers. They are likely to become very self-fish and abase their morality, which degrades company's reputation and gives rise to its own instability. The notorious example of Huawei in China well exemplifies my viewpoint. In spite of grasping with tremendous profit, Huawei totally relinquishes Chinese traditional cultures, which comprise society responsibilities in China. The money-centralized idea and unrespect of employee's health are deeply rooted in Huawei: overtime working and unhealth market competitions are fraught with its history. That is why lots of graduate dislike to take it as options of professional life. And even if they do so, they won't work more than two years.
Furthermore, gaining great reputation and positive societal images could benefit for corporations in the long run. To be specific, the real long-term success is nothing more than good reputation and sincere admiration by the public, which facilitate to establish a positive image in the society. Such images could implicitly guarantee more sustainable profitability: customers are tended to purchase its product, while partnership with others can be further fortified. SAP's positive community image is a case in point. Through incessant participating with charities, this German giant helps hundreds of people around the world. Whatever charitable activities are mentioned, be they Coronavirus donation, environmental protection and so on, SAP always joined enthusiastically and played a salient role. By utilizing repute out of such beneficence, even if it is still trapped with hackneyed product line and lagged in term of technologies, SAP is capable of staying profitability during the cloud era.
In summary, I believe corporations possess inalienable responsibility for the society as a whole, while they must accumulate sufficient profit for further development. Moreover, as prescient corporation leaders, it is also wise to make social responsibility with higher priority, since such wholesome endeavor could bring about more potential chances and sustain company's further development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laws'' or 'law's'?
Suggestion: laws'; law's
... to grasp with sufficient revenue under laws permission. From my perspective, I tend...
^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...wpoint, we can no further look at Apple in 1960s. By dedicating with idealistic products...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Apple) must be used with a third-person verb: 'loses'.
Suggestion: loses
...decoupled with companys revenues, Apple lose the practically financial foundation to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 910, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
...rges of bankrupts. Only after Steve Job returned back to eradicate infeasible products, Apple...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 759, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The notorious example of Huawei in China well exemplifies my viewpoint. In spite ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3302.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 562.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87544483986 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15896190001 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564056939502 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 1037.7 704.065955056 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1488501133 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187422748956 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535822829551 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682374353218 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126083207507 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695875788779 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.1639044944 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 187.0 100.480337079 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.