Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Some people are inclined towards the opinion which states that the involvement of government in funding of arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. While there is another cohort of people who argue that the participation of the government will threaten the integrity of the arts. I agree with the former statement and the following are the reasons for my point of view.
First of all, it’s not obscure to know that elitism has always been an integral part of exposure to art. This limitation in exposure of arts came with a great cost of losing some of the finest artist as well as an appreciative audience, this limitation can be refuted by the intervention of the government as funding provided by the government could actually bring down overall expenditure. Therefore enabling more people to enjoy the luxury of arts.
Secondly, the involvement of the government in art-related matters can improve the quality of art education in the nation. Lack of funding in art education has been an integral part of downfall and in some cases even the total shutdown of some of the best art institutions, this particular situation can easily be avoided by the participation of the government.
On the other hand, some people might think that the government funding of the arts may threaten the integrity of arts, if the government misuses arts to promote a particular agenda for some political benefits would compromise the overall creativity of the artist and will eventually lead to demotivation for them. However, this can be avoided by laying down some rules and regulations to check any such malpractice by the government.
In summary, I believe that the involvement of the government can be a boon to the arts. Therefore, I strongly support the idea of government funding of arts.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lourish and be available to all people. While there is another cohort of people who a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ctually bring down overall expenditure. Therefore enabling more people to enjoy the luxur...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, as well as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94480519481 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86660733182 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.1334872158 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 5.21951772744 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.556085683328 0.243740707755 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197667598659 0.0831039109588 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146752132351 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31801512361 0.150359130593 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875120602782 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lourish and be available to all people. While there is another cohort of people who a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ctually bring down overall expenditure. Therefore enabling more people to enjoy the luxur...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, as well as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94480519481 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86660733182 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.1334872158 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 5.21951772744 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.556085683328 0.243740707755 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197667598659 0.0831039109588 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146752132351 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31801512361 0.150359130593 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875120602782 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.