Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The argument above has two facets: (1) government funding is necessary for the arts to ensure that the arts can flourish and (2) government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. Sometimes it is true that the patronization from the government in arts threatens the integrity of the arts, but, in most of the cases, government funding is beneficial for the thriving of arts. Thus, I mostly agree with the first statement. Further, in the next three paragraph, I will discuss the two sides of the coin with evidence.
First of all, there are few cases where government funding hinders the burgeoning of arts rather than galvanizing it. For instance, when government, with no knowledge on arts, interferes in a matter about how arts' integrity can be achieved, then it rather defiles arts' integrity. Moreover, if someone asks Donald Trump, the president of United States, to make funding on patronizing Monalisa, an art, then It would rather diminish the value of that art. Further, If government makes funding on arts, then government's political leaders will intervene in the matter of arts, which further dampen the integrity of arts.
However, there are a lot of cases where government funding of the arts help flourish rather than ruining the integrity of arts. For example, in 6th century, there was an uncertainty among people in patronizing the arts of Roman Coliseum. In those time, there was no private company or agent who could take care of it. Then, the government intervened in the matter and started funding on the arts. After several months, the arts began flourishing and gaining its integrity which it was about to lose. In this situation, if government was not there, It would lose it's integrity.
Moreover, there are a lot of museums, which are run and funded by government, help flourish the arts by taking care of it. For instance, there are a lot of arts in the national museum of Bangladesh, which would not be extant, if government funding was not there. Indeed, government funding not only helps flourish the existent arts, but also it helps creating new arts. In fact, there are a lot of institutions, where people study arts, are funded by government.
In conclusion, everything has certain set backs as in this situation government funding on the arts has. But the benefits of government funding on the arts in helping flourishing the arts far out weigh the set backs. Therefore, I, based on the evidences above, aver that government funding is necessary to help flourish the arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to flourish' or 'flourish'.
Suggestion: to flourish; flourish
...ere government funding of the arts help flourishing rather than ruining the integrity of ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... For example, in 6th century, there was a uncertainty among people in patronizing...
^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or agent we could take care of it. Then, the government intervened in the matter ...
^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun month seems to be countable; consider using: 'several months'.
Suggestion: several months
... and started funding on the arts. After several month, the arts began flourishing and gaining...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to flourish' or 'flourish'.
Suggestion: to flourish; flourish
... are run and funded by government, help flourishing the arts by taking care of it. For inst...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to flourish' or 'flourish'.
Suggestion: to flourish; flourish
...deed, government funding not only helps flourishing the existent arts, but also it helps cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to create' or 'create'.
Suggestion: to create; create
...ng the existent arts, but also it helps creating new arts. In fact, there are a lot of i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to flourish' or 'flourish'.
Suggestion: to flourish; flourish
...vernment funding on the arts in helping flourishing the arts far out weigh the set backs. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to flourish' or 'flourish'.
Suggestion: to flourish; flourish
...government funding is necessary to help flourishing the arts.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96009389671 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76397161936 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43661971831 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0858917106 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.619047619 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474786556318 0.243740707755 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175008693285 0.0831039109588 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122923026636 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325122502944 0.150359130593 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451110146983 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.