Education is, without any hesitation, one of the most significant aspects of any social structure, particularly during the last century. Teachers and students are two primary elements of any educational system, and the relationship between them is the decisive factor that sets students on the path to success. There are different opinions on the main characteristics that teachers should have or cultivate in themselves in order to be able to assist their students in the best possible way. Some people hold the idea that teachers must be stringent toward their students to make them do their assignments and study the class materials. However, others with whom my standpoint is aligned believe that the most efficacious features of a decent teacher are understanding and a sense of empathy. In what follows, I will delineate my viewpoint on the ground of two persuasive reasons.
Without a doubt, the most consequential point corroborating my stance on this subject is that students, regardless of their age, usually study and do their homework spontaneously if they like their teachers. If teachers maintain positive features such as understanding, empathy, even a sense of humour, and so on, they can build a long-lasting bond with their students. Under this condition, students study and do their assignments or projects since they love their teacher and want to create a positive feeling in their teachers about themselves. In other words, students want to compensate for their teachers' favours through studying and satisfying their teachers' expectations. According to one survey conducted by researchers at MIT, pupils who had classes with those professors at MIT who have relatively more understanding and empathy than other professors are more successful in their careers. Over 80 percent of these students are still in touch with those professors. Therefore, the above survey and explanation manifest the significant impact of teachers' or professors' positive features on the success of their students.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that being too stringent toward students dramatically undermines the effectiveness of the teachers' teaching methods, even if they implement the most recent and efficacious methods. Students taking classes with strict teachers or professors just do their homework and projects out of fear, for instance, being humiliated by their teachers, not for the sake of their own good. These students are more prone to cheat in their exams or assignments since they want to only pass the course. Accordingly, not only do they learn nothing, but they also might never continue their education at a higher level despite their high level of intelligence or hidden talent in academic stuff, which might be possible in many students.
To make the long story short, and reflecting upon all the aforementioned grounds, one soon realizes that teachers' features are a deterministic element which may determine the path on which the students build their future. Positive characteristics such as understanding and empathy have promising effects on the students. In contrast, while negative features such as stringency might affect some students positively, they adversely influence a considerable proportion of students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 752, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...fficacious features of a decent teacher are understanding and a sense of empathy. In what follows...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2835.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44145873321 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99031806492 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508637236084 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0223590916 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.05 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315411412247 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101917649368 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675968391487 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19585436112 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471371732527 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.