Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer

There are different opinions on whether people should get a secure job if they have a chance to get it or if it is better for them to wait until they find the job they like. Although many people think that people should do a job they are interested in, I believe otherwise, maintaining that people should take any job if it is secured, no matter how much they like it. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.

Without a doubt, the most consequential reason regarding taking a secure job as soon as possible is the sense of relief that appears in people after finding an appropriate and safe job. If people seize the opportunity and take a job with secure payment, they take a big step forward. They obtain mental calmness, even for a short period. Consequently, they can concentrate on other aspects of their lives; for instance, they can delegate more time to their family and friends or think of visiting new places. Also, having a secure job helps people schedule their daily tasks for a long time without expecting abrupt and unexpected incidents. In this way, people know what they are going to do exactly on each day of the week. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests that taking a job as soon as possible is very crucial for every person.

Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is money. People work because they have to, not because they like it. They need money to build their future and the future of their children and family. A secure job means a job that guarantees a secure payment. If people get a secure job whenever they have the opportunity, they have more time to save money and prepare themselves for constructing their future. On the other hand, waiting for a more satisfying job not only will jeopardize one's future, but it also will waste time. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that giving a secure job to wait for a more interesting job is not a preferable decision.

All in all, many people are in favor of finding an interesting job even though it takes a long time. Nevertheless, the forgoing reasons lead us to conclude that people should take a job if they have the opportunity to do so; this helps them reach mental calmness and relief soon enough so they can plan for their future, and also people can save money in order to build their future earlier.

Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...satisfying job not only will jeopardize ones future, but it also will waste time. Th...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65819861432 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49936601576 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475750577367 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6448331193 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.157894737 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7894736842 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365335269485 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135342173403 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792107967687 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261683089936 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405068369356 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.