Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

There are different opinions on whether nowadays people, especially the young generation, allocate enough time to helping others or not. Although some people think that young people today care more about others than they did before, I believe otherwise, maintaining that in the intricate and difficult life of today, people put themselves and their needs as a high priority. They pay less attention to other people. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.

Without a doubt, the most consequential reason regarding why people, specifically young ones, do not give enough time to help others is the high level of complexity of living. Today life is very different from life in the past. Cities' expansion and technological progression are the main contributing factors to the rapid increase in the complexity of living in today's societies. In the big cities, and even in the small ones, many people have to work from a young age if they want to become prosper in the future. As a result, they are drowned in their problems and daily challenges, so they can not think about other people. Moreover, with the invention of electronic devices and public access to the internet, as a result of technology breakthroughs over the past twenty years, young people spend most of their free time playing video games, watching movies, or surfing the internet. Consequently, they can not find any time to allocate to their communities. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests that young people do not pay adequate attention to their communities.

Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable reason deserving some words here is how young people have been raised and educated. Not only today's education system but also families teach young people to only take care of themselves. They teach children to neither do they ask for help nor do they help others. Maybe this approach seems unfair and cruel at first glimpse, but it is reckoning one of the most beneficial ways of survival in nowadays society. Thus, the point illustrates the fact why young people do not devote enough time to assisting others.

All in all, many people are in favor of the idea that people nowadays are more caring about each other. Nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to conclude that today people are so entangled in their daily difficulties that they do not have time to think about others; this is because of the high level of complexity in their lives and the way they have been raised and educated.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...have been raised and educated. Not only todays education system but also families teac...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...of the most beneficial ways of survival in nowadays society. Thus, the point illustrates th...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99768518519 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64076342615 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506944444444 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0018964138 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.631578947 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271656622301 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879071890467 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706759158739 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179190324667 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346971063552 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...have been raised and educated. Not only todays education system but also families teac...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...of the most beneficial ways of survival in nowadays society. Thus, the point illustrates th...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99768518519 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64076342615 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506944444444 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0018964138 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.631578947 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271656622301 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879071890467 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706759158739 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179190324667 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346971063552 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.