Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders mush yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Insightful leaders have to make judgment base on their principles and objectives. The principles and objectives are their compass that will guide them the direction when they lose themselves in various kinds of temptation surrounding. However, if they changes their stance time after time, they are going to lose their credibility to the mass population very soon. Sometime, it may happen when there are no better choice and have to make compromises, but a leader always necessarily scrupulously scrutinizes and evaluates as much as to make comprehensive decisions.
Leaders have to stick on their visions and principles. If their decision making is based on public opinions, then it might happen that they have to change their policy very frequent. People don’t have such effort to check revisions if it keeps changing, and their accumulated anger will result in the resignation of leaders. In addition, it is important for leaders to discern the opinions of the public whether it is out of their need or insatiable desire. Sometimes, to cater to the people, leaders propose a series of policy; however, people change their desire and taste very soon, if leaders just keep satisfying their instant gratification, they might waste their precious time planing a series of short-lived strategy and lose their ultimate goal. Thus, if a leader can’t hold their faith, he or she will either soon lose their trust from the mass crowd or end up making no progress.
Leaders are shaped up by their principles and objectives. They need longanimity to stick on consistency to achieve the ultimate objectives. If Abraham Lincoln was going to compromise with the South, neither would he lead the America from the very tumultuous period and prevent secession, nor would he rescue the African from the clutches of slavery. Mahatma Gandhi is rendered as “the symbol of peace” - because in no case did he resort to violence. For a leader, vision and dream are their map, consistency and wisdom are their feet, if they keep going shall they find treasures.
Leaders may not be sharp or judicious all the time. They are human beings, where quixotic and obsession and wisdom paucity are inherent. But they are not allowed to make silly decision. Because they are influential, their irremediable temerity might lead to disastrous repercussion for myriads of population. Compromise is necessary in cooperation. Imagine a CEO of a huge company who was never to reconcile and insist that every single detail to be done exactly in his way. Very quickly he would lose the very people in order for a company to survive, people with great ideas, people ready to make advances. Without the ability to work constructively with those who have conflicting ideas, a leader will never be able to strike deals, reach consensus, or keep enterprise on track. By heeding more advices, he might be able to reach a more comprehensive decision making.
To sum up, it is necessary for leaders to insist on their principles and objectives. If a leader is going to follow the public opinions, he or she might turn out vacillating between countless opinions, and become less effective in making decision. So they shall not fear to irritate the crowd in order to make things right. But that is not saying a leader should act like a dictator. When they find a resolution, it takes their adamant courage to carry out policy, but before that, they have to make a great deal of compromises just in case something could be missing out or beyond consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...emptation surrounding. However, if they changes their stance time after time, they are ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, as to, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2960.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 587.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04258943782 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77745821661 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480408858603 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 926.1 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.205057987 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.068965517 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2413793103 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.34482758621 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144234669267 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512527845586 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445165039153 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944244226375 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250888204216 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.