By and large, there are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the features of effective leaders. Some people are in the conviction that yielding to public opinion and forsaking principle in order to achieve compromise should be done by the government. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another side embracing the view that the capability of remaining consistently committed to particular principles and objectives is the most characteristics of the effective leaders. I am of the latter opinion, supporting that because the public has a scanty information about the various aspects of the society; thus, the leaders cannot rely on their opinion; moreover, according to population growth, countries develop into a complex system; therefore, the government cannot consider all people’s insights. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that effective leaders must try to find some ways to communicate with their people to understand people’s opinion.
The first salient aspect to be introduced is that the public has little information about all society’s aspects. Informing people about all actions which government is done is an extremely hard and inefficient activity because some people never want to hear some useless data. A society is a set of people who have unique expertise in their jobs; so that, any information is not useful for many people in these societies. For example, some detail data about the number of published journal paper are not important for a soccer player because he has not any insight about various journals, scientific papers and etc.
Another equally noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that the complex world is caused to prevent leaders to support all the people’s opinion. Nowadays, in each society, due to population growth, two dilemmas are emerged for prevents leader to yield to public opinion. The first dilemma is that the leaders cannot speak to all people and hear all the opinions because it’s a time-consuming activity. The second reason is that applying all people ideas are a hard and complex manner. Thus, in this time, a leader must remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. There are some experts within people that can point out powerful and suitable ideas. The leader must be gathering those that people in various knowledge and expertise to help him for flourishing all the social aspects. Of course, this event works as a catalyst for developing the power of society.
From what was already mentioned, I firmly believe that it is more rational to the leaders remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only public have a scanty information about the various aspects of the society; thus, the leaders cannot rely on their opinion but also according to population growth, countries develop into a complex system; therefore, the government cannot consider all people’s insights. However, one should pay attention to the fact that the leader can gather some experts in each profession and enforced them to gather ideas within people which are in their vocation. As a matter of fact, some other reasons can be invoked to back up my perspective, but let us suffice to this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...out various journals, scientific papers and etc. Another equally noteworthy point co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous journals, scientific papers and etc. Another equally noteworthy point corrobo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, of course, as a matter of fact, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2987.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3055062167 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89725651637 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46891651865 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 946.8 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6822302936 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.772727273 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5909090909 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31957552162 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100586721802 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597715718602 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187593009112 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563857517629 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.