Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that television advertising can make some positive or negative impacts on young children. Nowadays, one of the most important parts of our life occupies by watching television, which happens to young children, too. Thus, controlling the impacts of this event done by parents who should look at their children after. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly in their attitudes towards this question what are the impacts of the television advertisement over their young children? A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that negative effects are more than positive. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that their young children can learn more elements when watching television advertising. If I want to choose between these options, I would take a side that young children should not be allowed to be watching TV advertising. I think this way because of two the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one is that due to the advertising attractiveness, the children won't pass any time for watching them and the second one is young children don’t know about which foods are good or bad; therefore, it may motivate them to buy a dangerous feed such as chips, ice-cream, and so on; however, they don’t have enough knowledge about that. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that watching advertisement may develop fallacy power in their mind. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.
First of all, I strongly believe that passing children’s time watching television advertisements cannot make amends for them. They can play with their friends, parents can teach them some basic knowledge about alphabets, numbers and so on. Therefore, I strongly debut was watched the advertisement for young children.
Another reason which should not go unnoticed is the lack of knowledge about what’s healthy or unhealthy for them. Some foods which advertise on the television have worse effects on children’s health. When they are watching TV, they absorb with colorful and attractive advertisements and may want to buy some unhealthy foods.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The first piece of evidence we need to know more, then analyze, is advertising impacts on children’s imagination. Power in imagination can attend people in another world. This skill is gaging in some jobs such as artwork and architecture; therefore, someone who occupies in these works have not only over the power of imagination but also the creative mind.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to negative impacts on the young child’s mind. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only have effects on free daily time, but also have effects on children’s health In the final analysis, the writer’s recommendation cannot be taken to be true because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of questions each of which should be answered. The recommendation can only be accepted if the mentioned statement already referred to are all implied appropriately.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 60 | view |
2019-12-27 | Bobby1987 | 86 | view |
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 85
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 80
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 60
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that recei 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2985.0 1977.66487455 151% => OK
No of words: 568.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25528169014 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00928798864 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484154929577 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 923.4 618.680645161 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0490645903 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45833333333 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190895482851 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609619411898 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393620144308 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104923566732 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550220036694 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.