Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that at university and colleges, sports and social activities are as crucial as classes and libraries. Social activities and sports can help to improve physical health; while, libraries, and classes can help to improve logical health. Every person who can provide a healthful body and wisdom can prolong his or her life. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly on their attitudes towards this question should these two groups receive equal financial champion? A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that this statement is true and these groups of activities should gain equal financial support. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that first groups, sports, and social activities, is more important than the second one. Where I to choose between these options, I would take the side of receiving equal champion for two sides. I think this way because of two of the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one is that using both first and second can effect on our quality of life and the second one is these two groups together can provide us healthier.
First of all, I strongly believe that quality of life can be improved by using every group along with our routine life. One of the most measures which can evaluate personal life is quality of life. This measure describes whether people in each society live willingly or not. Consequently, if people live more hopeful can live more ages. For example, suppose that both cities A and B has 7.2 and 7.4 in this measure, respectively. Of course, people in the second city live more than the first one because of future insights.
Another reason which should not go unnoticed is improved body and mental health which can make us healthier. Body and mentally improvement are two of the most factors in the life healthiness. Life healthiness is the best way to prolong our lives. In living more healthiness idea, both the first and second factors should be mixed and each one is crucial.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to receiving equal supports for each activity groups. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since using both can not only help us to improve our quality of life but also effects on our health. In the end, I express my agreement with the idea mentioned at the beginning of this essay and suggests authorities conduct a survey to investigate other crucial effects of at university and colleges, sports and social activities are as crucial as classes and libraries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, while, for example, i think, of course, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91949152542 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60423328939 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472457627119 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3942461039 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.545454545 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184234752453 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536774346461 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600423245021 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116406989443 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895473366532 0.0645574589148 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.