Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that television advertising can make some positive or negative impacts on young children. Nowadays, one of the most important parts of our life occupies by watching television, which happens to young children, too. Thus, controlling the impacts of this event done by parents who should look at their children after. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly in their attitudes towards this question what are the impacts of the television advertisement over their young children? A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that negative effects are more than positive. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that their young children can learn more elements when watching television advertising. If I want to choose between these options, I would take a side that young children should not be allowed to be watching TV advertising. I think this way because of two the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one is that due to the advertising attractiveness, the children won't pass any time for watching them and the second one is young children don’t know about which foods may good or bad; therefore, it may motivate them to buy a dangerous feed such as chips, ice-cream, and so on; however, they don’t have enough knowledge about that. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that watching broadcast may develop fallacy power in their mind. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.

First of all, I strongly believe that passing children’s time watching television advertisements cannot make amends for them. They can play with their friends, parents can teach them some basic knowledge about alphabets, numbers and so on. Therefore, I strongly debut was watched the broadcast for young children.

Another reason which should not go unnoticed is the lack of knowledge about what’s healthy or unhealthy for them. Some foods which advertise on the television have worse effects on children’s health. When they watch TV, they absorb with colorful and attractive advertisements and may want to buy some unhealthy foods.

In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional clue before accepting or refusing it completely. The first piece of clue we need to know more, then analyze, is advertising impacts on children’s fantasy. Power in imagination can attend people in another world. This skill may gage in some jobs such as artwork and architecture; therefore, someone who occupies in these works have not only over the power of fantasy but also the creative mind.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to negative impacts on the young child’s mind. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only have effects on free daily time, but also have effects on children’s health In the final analysis, the writer’s recommendation cannot be taken to be true because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of questions each of which should be answered. The recommendation can only be accepted if the mentioned statement already referred to are all implied appropriately.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, i think, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2954.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 567.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20987654321 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87972968509 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95536735337 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492063492063 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 905.4 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4260997884 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45833333333 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184586911942 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580003193447 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376709354593 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100856515619 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532450192759 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.