By and large, there are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the happiness and satisfaction between people who live now and ancient. Some people are in the conviction that ancient people were more satisfied with their lives. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another side embracing the view that the new generation of humans is more happy and satisfied. I am of the latter opinion, supporting that because new generation people travel from one point to another more comfortable, moreover, I think the technological aggression influence on our communication. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that people don’t have enough time to interact with each other or travel to other places nowadays.
The first salient aspect to be introduced is that transportation is one of the most things that make us comfortable to travel from one point to another one. In ancient, long time travels caused to make people boring and consequently, they like to reach their destination quickly. For example, if a family wants to have a trip from China and want to see all over the world, they might be on the trip for several months. Of course, some countries have many delicate places; however, some others make them tiring. The aggression of transportation caused to people can travel all the edge of the universe in a very time-consuming way. Thus, transportation which is one of the current changes against ancient which makes us happier.
Another equally noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that communicating with peoples around the world is another feature of the changing point of the world. contact with others people have many impacts on our lives, such as keeping us up to date about all events which occur around us, or we can contact our family in every position with one call. I think these impacts create when the worlds changed because each person who wants to make a relationship with another person should send one proposal card or send a telegraph in the ancient. For instance, if one person in India wants to ask a question about anything from one professor in United State, must travel or send a telegraph to him which is a very time-consuming activity.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The pieces of evidence we need to know more, then analyze, are that aggression in transportation or have some comfortable ways to communicate with other, or even modern technology are not very useful in some cases because many people should spend more and more time on their work to give money. I think the changing world is a mixed blessing.
From what was already mentioned, I firmly believe that it is more rational to benefit of advancing world. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since the world is transmuted not only the transportation is improved, but also make communication easier. However, one should pay attention to the fact that these changes influence many people because they should work more for using these instruments. As a matter of fact, some other reasons can be invoked to back up my perspective, but let us suffice for this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Contact
...ure of the changing point of the world. contact with others people have many impacts on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i think, of course, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2747.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 554.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95848375451 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81340085325 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476534296029 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9203112635 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.863636364 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95454545455 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180896642517 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631478336239 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573924227961 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110668091289 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505152978906 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.