The political leaders are elected to power by their constituents, it’s his duty to serve the people based on what the situation demands rather than some dogmatic principles prepared centuries ago. Hence, political leaders must yield to the public opinion and do what’s best for his constituency.
Consider gay marriage, a decade ago the thought of people belonging to the same gender marrying seems extremely ludicrous. Here we are in 2019 where it’s not only common for same couples to marry but also for people to change their gender. This was made possible because the political leaders have listened to the grievances of the LGBT community. This is a prime example of how it helps for a politician to listen to the public opinion, because the world has lost many great minds like Alan turing who was chemically castrated and later on commited suicide. The main rule in a democracy is “For the people and by the people”, if the politician discards public opinion altogether then it would be a autocratic rule. This is evident not only with the LGBT laws but the civil rights movement, where African American were treated inferior to their white counterparts and after prolonged struggles and protests, the were provided equal laws.
Furthermore, in India agriculture is one of the main occupation in the rural areas. The farmers suffer great losses due to the lack of agricultural law in the country. This results in the farmer taking loans and further loss takes him into a everlasting debt which has caused the suicides. If the government wouldn’t have listened to the public and provide subsidy on the loans it would’ve caused millions of people to lose their livelihood.
Nonetheless, constantly committing to rules has its own advantages. If the nuclear laws stated by the united nations is considered, it enumerates the rules to be followed by a country in order to build and test nuclear powers, if these are not adhered to we will end up with one more Hiroshima-Nagasaki incident which has caused human destruction on a colossal scale. Not only nuclear laws, if we consider the recent terrorist attacks on India, the general opinion of the Indian public was to go to a major war. As, witnessed by the air strikes carried out on the alleged terror camps suggested that the government have listened to the country’s anguish and attacked the terrorist site. Later, Pakistan army has tried attacking the Indian Military camps and in turn capturing an Indian soldier. If the pakistan government have yielded to the public opinions and not adhering to the geneva convention which states how a war prisoner must be handled. It would have resulted in a serious war between two nuclear powers. Hence, we can understand why it's important for a politician to strictly follow the rules.
Finally, for a government to have a halcyon regime it’s important to heed the grievances of the community and take an action as necessary, if not the world democracy in its entirety would lose the essence which could end up hurting the identity of a nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lic opinion altogether then it would be a autocratic rule. This is evident not on...
^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...g loans and further loss takes him into a everlasting debt which has caused the s...
^
Line 8, column 867, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have yielded to the public opinions and not adhering to the geneva convention wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2591.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03106796117 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81741082406 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532038834951 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4057384419 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.380952381 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5238095238 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167758548847 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499200046266 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594625070368 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962918010835 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730877673224 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.