Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Technology has a vast impact on our day to day life, including the way we communicate with people around us. Major developments in field of communication has taken place in last two-three decades only. If we look back three decades ago, only couple of options were available for interacting with acquaintances. But today things are different, one can choose from several options depending as per need. We can easily observe that technology has facilitated the human interaction in more than one way.
To begin with, we cannot undermine the fact that science has opened various new communication channels for human interaction. From text messaging to voice calls to video calls and now upcoming augment reality, one can never feel left isolated from friends no matter the physical distance between them. Take for instance, augmented reality provides you the experience of talking to your friends' virtual avatars as if they were sitting with you in your proximity.
Secondly, the time lapse in days which was previously there when people living miles apart felt because of the delay in delivery and receipt of messages sent to each other has now been reduced to seconds, this not only helps in making interactions better but more useful. For example, if a soldier fighting for his country on some remote lands had to interact with family members he would have to wait for weeks before the next letter arrives. With the availability of cheap satellite communication channels one can now instantly video chat with family at home. Furthermore, The delay has been reduced in package delivery as well. Now you can order anything from any country and expect it to arrive before your week ends.
Additionally, it has opened new ways of connecting with people globally. People with different countries and culture now exchange feelings over the internet at the ease of pressing a button. Even those who are considered introvert and gauche are now expressing themselves. Some express concerns over war going on in some other country, while some exchange music and knowledge, while others are busy learning about systems that solved problems abroad, to help abate similar problems in their native lands. Take for an example, the war in Syria, The origin of ISIS terrorists group attracted whole worlds concerns and now multiple nations are united to get rid of militants from the impacted area.
Conversely, one can say that the technology has reduced the chances of physical encounters that most people used to do before. And that actually meeting someone gives a whole lot of enjoyment and a different feeling from all the tech-ways of communication. But we shall not forget that no one has bounded us from meeting those who we love. People still set out and travel thousands of miles just to meet their loved ones.
Conclusively, the impact of technology on human interaction has changed our lives in more than expected ways. Yet, it depends on us that how much effort we are willing to put only to meet our acquaintances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...d that actually meeting someone gives a whole lot of enjoyment and a different feeling fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03386454183 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64612099462 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573705179283 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 802.8 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1919752052 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.291666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304665674541 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826624199734 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713966892648 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147130141621 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300227939797 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.