An individual's personality is defined through the type of morals he/she consists of. Morals are highly essential in a person's life. Morality defines the person's Integrity, Honesty, Compatibility with others and even his role in the society. It seems easy to construe the nature of the person through his morals. So I firmly believe that teaching morality and making a person a better human being should be the foundation of one's education.
It is believed by many that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would contribute more towards producing a moral society. But this assumption is highly contaminated as making someone logically smart and not teaching the person the importance of morals will ultimately turn him into a selfish person. Let us take into consideration a society with people who contain no moral values and and are only taught to be logically smart throughout their lives. It would end up to be a welter of competitive, avarice and querulous people with only selfish needs increasing bastardisation in today's world.
Morality makes the person believe in the society and makes him/her contribute more towards the betterment of the society. It is because of the person's moral values that make the person more altruistic and teaches the person to respect and care other aspects of the society as well. Morality increases the love in the society and reduces the enmity in people's mind for each other.
Though teaching the foundations of logical reasoning is also very consequential in today's world for advancement of the people in the society but a perfect melange of Moral Values along with the logical values is what the society needs and is required. As it would make the world a better place to live in along with the world moving forward to achieve more and reach the pinnacle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
An individuals personality is defined through the type...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ts of. Morals are highly essential in a persons life. Morality defines the persons Inte...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...human being should be the foundation of ones education. It is believed by many th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...with people who contain no moral values and and are only taught to be logically smart t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70775737068 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495016611296 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2591325818 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324706814346 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133517521131 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118605773525 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211079279818 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467464409804 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.