Some people think that experimenting with animals in laboratories is the best way to ensure new products will be safe for human use.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Experiment with animals for human beings to use new staff is of vital concern to society. Some visionaries, including the speaker, speak of a world in which to confirm the safeness of new manufactures for humans, laboratories experiment by using animals is the most appropriate method. I disagree with this speaker’s idea.
The chief reason for my assertion lies in ethics, especially life importance. In the view point of how life is important, the author’s opinion ignores animal’s life. In fact, animal experiment for human use has at least one merit: the victim of other animals such as a mouse let worse sub or main effect of new products reduced. In other words, other lives rescue human life. However, ethically, human life is not superior to other animal’s life. Significance of life is equal among all creatures. Let us consider two examples to further verify my assertion.
The first example is a laboratory experiment of medicine. As usual, mouse or monkey are used to check how this medicine is effective or involves negative effect on human body. To achieve creating medicine for human use without bad sub effect, thousand or millions experiments are executed repeatedly. This implies that thousand or millions mice or monkeys died for the medicine to save human life.
I next turn to the example of an experiment with rabbits for cosmetic goods. To investigate how cosmetic goods are toxic for human beings, these goods shotted to rabbits eye. These rabbits were binded and tolerated crucial pain for three or four days, and then some of them died due to the pain. Cosmetic goods let women become beautiful without hard negative effect, but their beauty stands on death of a lot of rabbits.
In sum, I would like to stress that speaker’s idea- animal experiment in laboratories is nicest approach to confirm safeness of new manufactures for us to use- neglects importance of animal’s life. Therefore, even though this way has some merits, I do not agree with the author’s idea. I believe that all animal’s life including human beings are equal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...or main effect of new products reduced. In other words, other lives rescue human l...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne for human use without bad sub effect, thousand or millions experiments are exe...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... for human use without bad sub effect, thousand or millions experiments are executed re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty stands on death of a lot of rabbits. In sum, I would like to stress that spea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 92, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the nicest'.
Suggestion: is the nicest
...idea- animal experiment in laboratories is nicest approach to confirm safeness of new man...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, at least, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12463768116 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87779525402 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3810545676 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1904761905 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320053162605 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101409264279 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823761483354 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197309423993 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106278600257 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.